Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28173766›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2017

Factors influencing decision of general practitioners and managers to train and employ a nurse practitioner or physician assistant in primary care: a qualitative study.

Mieke van der Biezen, Emmy Derckx, Michel Wensing, Miranda Laurant

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of the physician associate: an overview.Irish journal of medical science · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mieke van der BiezenRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, P.O. Box 910, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands. Mieke.vanderbiezen@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6682-2558
Emmy DerckxFoundation for Development of Quality Care in General Practice, Tilburgseweg-West 100, Eindhoven, 5652 NP, The Netherlands.
Michel WensingRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, P.O. Box 910, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Miranda LaurantRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, P.O. Box 910, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLHAN University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the increasing demand on primary care, it is not only debated whether there are enough general practitioners (GPs) to comply with these demands but also whether specific tasks can be performed by other care providers. Although changing the workforce skill mix care by employing Physician Assistants (PAs) and Nurse Practitioners (NPs) has proven to be both effective and safe, the implementation of those professionals differs widely between and within countries. To support policy making regarding PAs/NPs in primary care, the aim of this study is to provide insight into factors influencing the decision of GPs and managers to train and employ a PA/NP within their organisation.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted in 2014 in which 7 managers of out-of-hours primary care services and 32 GPs who owned a general practice were interviewed. Three main topic areas were covered in the interviews: the decision-making process in the organisation, considerations and arguments to train and employ a PA/NP, and the tasks and responsibilities of a PA/NP.

resultsEmployment of PAs/NPs in out-of-hours services was intended to substitute care for minor ailments in order to decrease GPs' caseload or to increase service capacity. Mangers formulated long-term planning and role definitions when changing workforce skill mix. Lastly, out-of-hours services experienced difficulties with creating team support among their members regarding the employment of PAs/NPs. In general practices during office hours, GPs indented both substitution and supplementation for minor ailments and/or target populations through changing the skill mix. Supplementation was aimed at improving quality of care and extending the range of services to patients. The decision-making in general practices was accompanied with little planning and role definition. The willingness to employ PAs/NPs was highly influenced by an employees' motivation to start the master's programme and GPs' prior experience with PAs/NPs. Knowledge about the PA/NP profession and legislations was often lacking.

conclusionsRole standardisations, long-term political planning and support from professional associations are needed to support policy makers in implementing skill mix in primary care.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchGeneral PractitionersHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansNetherlandsNurse PractitionersPhysician AssistantsPrimary Health CareGeneral practitionerImplementationNurse practitionerPhysician assistantPrimary careSkill mixSubstitutionSupplementation

Identifiers

PMID28173766
PMCPMC5297134
OpenAlexW2587689402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.