Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28173757›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2017

Secondary prevention strategies after an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the AMI code era: beyond myocardial mechanical reperfusion.

Núria Ribas, Cosme García-García, Oona Meroño, Lluís Recasens, Silvia Pérez-Fernández, Víctor Bazán, Neus Salvatella, Julio Martí-Almor, Jordi Bruguera, Roberto Elosua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Núria RibasCardiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. 60055@hospitaldelmar.cat.
Cosme García-GarcíaCardiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Oona MeroñoCardiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Lluís RecasensCardiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia Pérez-FernándezIMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute). Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Genetics Group (EGEC), REGICOR Study Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Víctor BazánCardiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Neus SalvatellaCardiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Julio Martí-AlmorCardiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi BrugueraCardiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Roberto ElosuaIMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute). Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Genetics Group (EGEC), REGICOR Study Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Del Mar · ESHospital del Mar Research Institute · ESMunicipal Institute for Medical Research · ESHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe AMI code is a regional network enhancing a rapid and widespread access to reperfusion therapy (giving priority to primary angioplasty) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to assess the long-term control of conventional cardiovascular risk factors after a STEMI among patients included in the AMI code registry. DESIGN AND

methodsFour hundred and fifty-four patients were prospectively included between June-2009 and April-2013. Clinical characteristics were collected at baseline. The long-term control of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular morbidity/mortality was assessed among the 6-months survivors.

resultsA total of 423 patients overcame the first 6 months after the STEMI episode, of whom 370 (87%) underwent reperfusion therapy (363, 98% of them, with primary angioplasty). At 1-year follow-up, only 263 (62%) had adequate blood pressure control, 123 (29%) had LDL-cholesterol within targeted levels, 126/210 (60%) smokers had withdrawn from their habit and 40/112 (36%) diabetic patients had adequate glycosylated hemoglobin levels. During a median follow-up of 20 (11-30) months, cumulative mortality of 6 month-survivors was 6.1%, with 9.9% of hospital cardiovascular readmissions. The lack of assessment of LDL and HDL-cholesterol were significantly associated with higher mortality and cardiovascular readmission rates.

conclusionsWhereas implementation of the AMI code resulted in a widespread access to rapid reperfusion therapy, its long-term therapeutic benefit may be partially counterbalanced by a manifestly suboptimal control of cardiovascular risk factors. Further efforts should be devoted to secondary prevention strategies after STEMI.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsHypolipidemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionProgram EvaluationProspective StudiesRecurrenceRegistriesAntihypertensive AgentsHypoglycemic AgentsHypolipidemic AgentsCardiovascular risk factorsCoronary angioplastyPrognosisReperfusion therapySecondary preventionST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID28173757
PMCPMC5297147
OpenAlexW2586532244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.