Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28173538›Full record

ReviewSystematic biology2017

Review Paper: The Shape of Phylogenetic Treespace.

Katherine St. John

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Systematic biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Navigating the mysterious space of evolutionary histories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Biological causes and impacts of rugged tree landscapes in phylodynamic inference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A vector representation for phylogenetic trees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Computational Reproducibility of Molecular Phylogenies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. ENJ algorithm can construct triple phylogenetic trees.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Katherine St. JohnDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Lehman College, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trees are a canonical structure for representing evolutionary histories. Many popular criteria used to infer optimal trees are computationally hard, and the number of possible tree shapes grows super-exponentially in the number of taxa. The underlying structure of the spaces of trees yields rich insights that can improve the search for optimal trees, both in accuracy and in running time, and the analysis and visualization of results. We review the past work on analyzing and comparing trees by their shape as well as recent work that incorporates trees with weighted branch lengths.

Indexed as

ClassificationPhylogenyReproducibility of ResultsMaximum likelihoodmaximum parsimonytree metricstreespace

Identifiers

PMID28173538
PMCPMC5837343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.