Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28172869›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Decay of Sexual Trait Genes in an Asexual Parasitoid Wasp.

Ken Kraaijeveld, Seyed Yahya Anvar, Jeroen Frank, Arnoud Schmitz, Jens Bast, Jeanne Wilbrandt, Malte Petersen, Tanja Ziesmann, Oliver Niehuis, Peter de Knijff and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Loss, persistence and reversal of phenotypic traits.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Parthenogenesis in dipterans: a genetic perspective.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic Features of Parthenogenetic Animals.The Journal of heredity · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic Resources forG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Genomes of the Hymenoptera.Current opinion in insect science · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ken KraaijeveldAnimal Ecology, Department of Ecological Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Seyed Yahya AnvarLeiden Genome Technology Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jeroen FrankLeiden Genome Technology Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arnoud SchmitzLeiden Genome Technology Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jens BastDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jeanne WilbrandtZoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Center for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Bonn, Germany.
Malte PetersenZoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Center for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Bonn, Germany.
Tanja ZiesmannZoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Center for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Bonn, Germany.
Oliver NiehuisZoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Center for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Bonn, Germany.
Peter de KnijffDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johan T den DunnenLeiden Genome Technology Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jacintha EllersAnimal Ecology, Department of Ecological Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLZoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig · DEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trait loss is a widespread phenomenon with pervasive consequences for a species’ evolutionary potential. The genetic changes underlying trait loss have only been clarified in a small number of cases. None of these studies can identify whether the loss of the trait under study was a result of neutral mutation accumulation or negative selection. This distinction is relatively clear-cut in the loss of sexual traits in asexual organisms. Male-specific sexual traits are not expressed and can only decay through neutral mutations, whereas female-specific traits are expressed and subject to negative selection. We present the genome of an asexual parasitoid wasp and compare it to that of a sexual lineage of the same species. We identify a short-list of 16 genes for which the asexual lineage carries deleterious SNP or indel variants, whereas the sexual lineage does not. Using tissue-specific expression data from other insects, we show that fifteen of these are expressed in male-specific reproductive tissues. Only one deleterious variant was found that is expressed in the female-specific spermathecae, a trait that is heavily degraded and thought to be under negative selection in L. clavipes. Although the phenotypic decay of male-specific sexual traits in asexuals is generally slow compared with the decay of female-specific sexual traits, we show that male-specific traits do indeed accumulate deleterious mutations as expected by theory. Our results provide an excellent starting point for detailed study of the genomics of neutral and selected trait decay.

Indexed as

Genes, InsectReproduction, AsexualAnimalsFemaleMaleMutationPhenotypePhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideWaspsdeleterious variantsLeptopilina clavipesparthenogenesissexual trait decayWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID28172869
PMCPMC5381511
OpenAlexW2556032326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.