Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28171817›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2017

Public attitudes towards alcohol control policies in Scotland and England: Results from a mixed-methods study.

Jessica Li, Melanie Lovatt, Douglas Eadie, Fiona Dobbie, Petra Meier, John Holmes, Gerard Hastings, Anne Marie MacKintosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Adolescents' Alcohol Use inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica LiSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jessica.li@sheffield.ac.uk.
Melanie LovattSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom; Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, United Kingdom.
Douglas EadieInstitute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, United Kingdom.
Fiona DobbieInstitute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, United Kingdom.
Petra MeierSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
John HolmesSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Gerard HastingsInstitute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, United Kingdom.
Anne Marie MacKintoshInstitute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J000523/1Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The harmful effects of heavy drinking on health have been widely reported, yet public opinion on governmental responsibility for alcohol control remains divided. This study examines UK public attitudes towards alcohol policies, identifies underlying dimensions that inform these, and relationships with perceived effectiveness. A cross-sectional mixed methods study involving a telephone survey of 3477 adult drinkers aged 16-65 and sixteen focus groups with 89 adult drinkers in Scotland and England was conducted between September 2012 and February 2013. Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to reduce twelve policy statements into underlying dimensions. These dimensions were used in linear regression models examining alcohol policy support by demographics, drinking behaviour and perceptions of UK drinking and government responsibility. Findings were supplemented with a thematic analysis of focus group transcripts. A majority of survey respondents supported all alcohol policies, although the level of support varied by type of policy. Greater enforcement of laws on under-age sales and more police patrolling the streets were strongly supported while support for pricing policies and restricting access to alcohol was more divided. PCA identified four main dimensions underlying support on policies: alcohol availability, provision of health information and treatment services, alcohol pricing, and greater law enforcement. Being female, older, a moderate drinker, and holding a belief that government should do more to reduce alcohol harms were associated with higher support on all policy dimensions. Focus group data revealed findings from the survey may have presented an overly positive level of support on all policies due to differences in perceived policy effectiveness. Perceived effectiveness can help inform underlying patterns of policy support and should be considered in conjunction with standard measures of support in future research on alcohol control policies.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthPublic OpinionAdolescentAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PolicyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedScotlandAlcoholAlcohol policyAlcohol policy attitudesMixed-methodsTelephone surveyUK

Identifiers

PMID28171817
PMCPMC5341733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.