Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28170410›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Disclosure of HIV status and its impact on the loss in the follow-up of HIV-infected patients on potent anti-retroviral therapy programs in a (post-) conflict setting: A retrospective cohort study from Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Pierre Zalagile Akilimali, Patou Masika Musumari, Espérance Kashala-Abotnes, Patrick Kalambayi Kayembe, François B Lepira, Paulin Beya Mutombo, Thorkild Tylleskar, Mapatano Mala Ali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Factors related to loss to follow-up among people living with HIV: a systematic review.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pierre Zalagile AkilimaliKinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Patou Masika MusumariDepartment of Global Health and Socio-Epidemiology, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
Espérance Kashala-AbotnesDepartment of Global Health and Primary Care, Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Patrick Kalambayi KayembeKinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
François B LepiraDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Paulin Beya MutomboKinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Thorkild TylleskarDepartment of Global Health and Primary Care, Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Mapatano Mala AliKinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
University of Kinshasa · CDUniversity of Bergen · NOKyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aimed to identify the impact of non-disclosure of HIV status on the loss to follow-up (LTFU) of patients receiving anti-retroviral therapy. METHODOLOGY: A historic cohort of HIV patients from 2 major hospitals in Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo was followed from 2004 to 2012. LTFU was defined as not taking an ART refill for a period of 3 months or longer since the last attendance, and had not yet been classified as 'dead' or 'transferred-out'. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to determine the probability of LTFU as a function of time as inclusive of the cohort. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves based on determinants. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to measure predictors of LTFU from the time of treatment induction until December 15th, 2012 (the end-point).

resultsThe median follow-up time was 3.99 years (IQR = 2.33 to 5.59). Seventy percent of patients had shared their HIV status with others (95% CI: 66.3-73.1). The proportion of LTFU was 12% (95%CI: 9.6-14.4). Patients who did not share their HIV status (Adjusted HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.46-2.29), patients who did not live in the city of Goma (Adjusted HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.02-3.77), and those who attained secondary or higher education level (Adjusted HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.02-2.53) had a higher hazard of being LTFU.

conclusionThis study shows the relationship between the non-disclosure HIV status and LTFU. Healthcare workers in similar settings should pay more attention to clients who have not disclosed their HIV status, and to those living far from health settings where they receive medication.

Indexed as

DisclosureAdultAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCD4 Lymphocyte CountDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceLost to Follow-UpMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesViral Load

Identifiers

PMID28170410
PMCPMC5295697
OpenAlexW2587547834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.