Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28170387›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2017

Early growth faltering in post-institutionalized youth and later anthropometric and pubertal development.

Brie M Reid, Bradley S Miller, Lorah D Dorn, Christopher Desjardins, Bonny Donzella, Megan Gunnar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevention of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Pubertal stress recalibration reverses the effects of early life stress in postinstitutionalized children.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brie M ReidInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Bradley S MillerDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Lorah D DornCollege of Nursing and Department of Pediatrics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Christopher DesjardinsCenter for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Bonny DonzellaInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Megan GunnarInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Pubertal Stress Recalibration HypothesisR01HD075349 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GUNNAR, MEGAN R · 2013 to 2018
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundEarly-life adversity that increases the risk of growth stunting is hypothesized to increase the risk of obesity and, in girls, early-onset puberty. This hypothesis was tested in children adopted from orphanages.MethodsPost-institutionalized (PI) youth were compared with youth reared in comparable families (non-adopted; NA) on height, weight, pubertal stage, and fat mass (127 PI, 80 female; 156 NA, 85 female, aged 7-14 years). Anthropometric findings at adoption were obtained from first US clinic visits.ResultsOverall, 25% of PI youth were height-stunted (<3rd percentile) at adoption. Years post adoption, PI youth had lower BMI-for-age (P=0.004), height-for-age (P<0.001), and less body fat (P<0.001) than NA youth had, but they did not differ by sex. Pubertal status did not differ by group or sex. The anthropometric findings held when the stunted-at-adoption subset was examined; they were also less likely to be in central puberty than other PI youth.ConclusionEarly deprived orphanage care increases the risk of growth stunting but not obesity in children adopted into US families, and it does not independently contribute to early-onset puberty for PI girls. The role of the environment following early adversity may modify the impact of early adverse care.

Indexed as

AnthropometryGrowthOrphanagesPubertyAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID28170387
PMCPMC5552432
OpenAlexW2587155620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.