Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28170372›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2017

Prognostication and monitoring of mesothelioma using biomarkers: a systematic review.

David T Arnold, Duneesha De Fonseka, Fergus W Hamilton, Najib M Rahman, Nick A Maskell

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pleural Mesothelioma Staging Project: Updated Modeling of Prognostic Factors in Pleural Mesothelioma.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Time Is Running Out.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David T ArnoldAcademic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Learning and Research Centre, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Duneesha De FonsekaAcademic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Learning and Research Centre, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Fergus W HamiltonSouthmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Najib M RahmanOxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK.
Nick A MaskellAcademic Respiratory Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Learning and Research Centre, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Southmead Hospital · GBChurchill Hospital · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-RP-14-A17178Medical Research Council G0600475Medical Research Council G1001128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiological markers of treatment response and prognostication in malignant pleural mesothelioma have limitations due to the morphology of the disease. Serum or pleural fluid biomarkers that could act as an adjunct to radiological assessment would be of significant value. The aim of this review was to collate and summarise the literature relating to this topic.

methodsA systematic review was performed on the databases Pubmed and EMBASE to identify relevant studies. Two independent researchers read the abstracts and used the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool to assess the quality of the evidence.

resultsForty-five studies were identified from the current literature. Twenty studies investigated the role of serum soluble mesothelin with majority suggesting that it has variable utility as a baseline test but when measured serially correlates with treatment response and prognosis. Several studies demonstrated that serum osteopontin correlated with survival at baseline. Other biomarkers have shown prognostic utility in individual studies but are yet to be reproduced in large cohort studies.

conclusionsFrom the available literature no serum or pleural fluid biomarker was identified that could be recommended currently for routine clinical practice. However, a falling serum soluble mesothelin might correlate with treatment response and improved survival.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorHumansMesotheliomaPleural NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID28170372
PMCPMC5355927
OpenAlexW2586539873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.