Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28170313›Full record

ReviewTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association2017

The Empirical Foundations of Telepathology: Evidence of Feasibility and Intermediate Effects.

Rashid L Bashshur, Elizabeth A Krupinski, Ronald S Weinstein, Matthew R Dunn, Noura Bashshur

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Critical Value of Telepathology in the COVID-19 Era.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Telemedicine in Neurological Disorders: Opportunities and Challenges.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rashid L Bashshur1 School of Public Health, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Elizabeth A Krupinski2 Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University , Atlanta, Georgia .
Ronald S Weinstein3 Department of Pathology, University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona.
Matthew R Dunn1 School of Public Health, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Noura Bashshur1 School of Public Health, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Michigan Medicine · USEmory University · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTelepathology evolved from video microscopy (i.e., "television microscopy") research in the early 1950s to video microscopy used in basic research in the biological sciences to a basic diagnostic tool in telemedicine clinical applications. Its genesis can be traced to pioneering feasibility studies regarding the importance of color and other image-based parameters for rendering diagnoses and a series of studies assessing concordance of virtual slide and light microscopy diagnoses. This article documents the empirical foundations of telepathology.

methodsA selective review of the research literature during the past decade (2005-2016) was conducted using robust research design and adequate sample size as criteria for inclusion.

conclusionsThe evidence regarding feasibility/acceptance of telepathology and related information technology applications has been well documented for several decades. The majority of evidentiary studies focused on intermediate outcomes, as indicated by comparability between telepathology and conventional light microscopy. A consistent trend of concordance between the two modalities was observed in terms of diagnostic accuracy and reliability. Additional benefits include use of telepathology and whole slide imaging for teaching, research, and outreach to resource-limited countries. Challenges still exist, however, in terms of use of telepathology as an effective diagnostic modality in clinical practice.

Indexed as

History, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansRemote ConsultationReproducibility of ResultsTelepathologycostdigital pathologytelemedicinetelepathologyvirtual microscopywhole slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID28170313
PMCPMC5359695
OpenAlexW2586182284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.