Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28169951›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in cardiology2017

Cardiac gene therapy with adeno-associated virus-based vectors.

Kyle Chamberlain, Jalish M Riyad, Thomas Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. C-Terminus of CaCells · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cellular basis of HFpEF: contributions of abnormal lipids.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Human gene therapy · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyle ChamberlainDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Center and Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Jalish M Riyad
Thomas Weber

Funding

Anti-AAV Antibodies as an Obstacle to Cardiac AAV Gene TherapyR01HL131404 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI WEBER, THOMAS · 2016 to 2019
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCardiac gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based vectors is emerging as an entirely new platform to treat, or even cure, so far intractable cardiac disorders. This review describes our current knowledge of cardiac AAV gene therapy with a particular focus on the biggest obstacle for the successful translation of cardiac AAV gene therapy into the clinic, namely the efficient delivery of the therapeutic gene to the myocardium. RECENT

findingsWe summarize the significant recent progress that has been made in treating heart failure in preclinically relevant animal models with AAV gene therapy and the recent results of clinical trials with cardiac AAV gene therapy for the treatment of heart failure. We also discuss the benefits and shortcomings of the currently available delivery methods of AAV to the heart. Finally, we describe the current state of identifying novel AAV variants that have enhanced tropism for human cardiomyocytes and that show increased resistance to preexisting neutralizing antibodies. SUMMARY: Here, we describe the successes and challenges in cardiac AAV gene therapy, a treatment modality that has the potential to transform current treatment approaches for cardiac diseases.

Identifiers

PMID28169951
PMCPMC5544589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.