Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28169461›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2017

Harmonization of serum 25-hydroxycalciferol assay results from high-performance liquid chromatography, enzyme immunoassay, radioimmunoassay, and immunochemiluminescence systems: A multicenter study.

Bahareh Nikooyeh, Siamak M Samiee, Marjan R Farzami, Hamid Alavimajd, Maliheh Zahedirad, Ali Kalayi, Nastaran Shariatzadeh, Nasrin Boroumand, Elham Golshekan, Yalda Gholamian and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Vitamin D testing: advantages and limits of the current assays.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bahareh NikooyehLaboratory of Nutrition Research, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute and Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Siamak M SamieeHealth Reference Laboratories (HRL), Iran Ministry of Health, Tehran, Iran.
Marjan R FarzamiHealth Reference Laboratories (HRL), Iran Ministry of Health, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid AlavimajdDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Paramedicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maliheh ZahediradLaboratory of Nutrition Research, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute and Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali KalayiLaboratory of Nutrition Research, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute and Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nastaran ShariatzadehLaboratory of Nutrition Research, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute and Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nasrin BoroumandDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Paramedicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elham GolshekanHealth Reference Laboratories (HRL), Iran Ministry of Health, Tehran, Iran.
Yalda GholamianHealth Reference Laboratories (HRL), Iran Ministry of Health, Tehran, Iran.
Tirang R NeyestaniLaboratory of Nutrition Research, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute and Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemarkable disagreement among different systems of 25-hydroxy vitamin D 25(OH)D assay makes decision making for both clinical and community interventions very difficult. This study aimed to harmonize the results obtained from different 25(OH)D assay systems.

methodsA total of 275 serum samples were analyzed for 25(OH)D using DIAsource-enzyme immunoassay (EIA), DIAsource-radioimmunoassay (RIA), Roche-electrochemiluminescence (ECL), Diasorin-chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), as the reference method. Serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) was also measured in all samples. Between-system agreement and harmonization were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and regression analysis.

resultsMean serum 25(OH)D concentrations and frequency distribution of vitamin D status showed a significant difference among the studied systems (P<.001 for both). Serum 25(OH)D assay results from all systems correlated with those from HPLC. As compared with HPLC, ECL showed a positive bias (+3.8 nmol/L), whereas CLIA had a negative bias (-11.9 nmol/L). Both EIA and RIA showed a more or less similar positive bias (8.0 and 8.1 nmol/L, respectively). Using serum iPTH-based 25(OH)D cutoff points, only ECL results became comparable to and without significant difference with HPLC. However, when system-specific cutoffs were defined based on HPLC results using regression equations, mean 25(OH)D and frequency distribution of vitamin D status were more harmonized compared with the other methods.

conclusionOur findings showed that with adjustment of circulating 25(OH)D based on HPLC, frequency distribution of vitamin D status, as judged by different methods, can be well harmonized with no statistically significant inter-system difference.

Indexed as

25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2AdultBlood Chemical AnalysisChromatography, High Pressure LiquidFemaleHumansImmunoassayLuminescent MeasurementsMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveYoung Adult25-Hydroxyvitamin D 225-hydroxycalciferolharmonizationhigh-performance liquid chromatographyimmunoassayvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID28169461
PMCPMC6817016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.