Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28169349›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Dynamic hub load predicts cognitive decline after resective neurosurgery.

Ellen W S Carbo, Arjan Hillebrand, Edwin van Dellen, Prejaas Tewarie, Philip C de Witt Hamer, Johannes C Baayen, Martin Klein, Jeroen J G Geurts, Jaap C Reijneveld, Cornelis J Stam and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ellen W S CarboDepartment of Anatomy &Neurosciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjan HillebrandDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Edwin van DellenDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Prejaas TewarieDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Philip C de Witt HamerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes C BaayenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin KleinVUmc CCA Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen J G GeurtsDepartment of Anatomy &Neurosciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap C ReijneveldDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis J StamDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda DouwDepartment of Anatomy &Neurosciences, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resective neurosurgery carries the risk of postoperative cognitive deterioration. The concept of 'hub (over)load', caused by (over)use of the most important brain regions, has been theoretically postulated in relation to symptomatology and neurological disease course, but lacks experimental confirmation. We investigated functional hub load and postsurgical cognitive deterioration in patients undergoing lesion resection. Patients (n = 28) underwent resting-state magnetoencephalography and neuropsychological assessments preoperatively and 1-year after lesion resection. We calculated stationary hub load score (SHub) indicating to what extent brain regions linked different subsystems; high SHub indicates larger processing pressure on hub regions. Dynamic hub load score (DHub) assessed its variability over time; low values, particularly in combination with high SHub values, indicate increased load, because of consistently high usage of hub regions. Hypothetically, increased SHub and decreased DHub relate to hub overload and thus poorer/deteriorating cognition. Between time points, deteriorating verbal memory performance correlated with decreasing upper alpha DHub. Moreover, preoperatively low DHub values accurately predicted declining verbal memory performance. In summary, dynamic hub load relates to cognitive functioning in patients undergoing lesion resection: postoperative cognitive decline can be tracked and even predicted using dynamic hub load, suggesting it may be used as a prognostic marker for tailored treatment planning.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain NeoplasmsCognitionCognitive DysfunctionConnectomeFemaleGliomaGyrus CinguliHemangioma, CavernousHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyMaleMemoryMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID28169349
PMCPMC5294457
OpenAlexW2586940689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.