Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28169286›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2017

Garcinol Blocks the Reconsolidation of Multiple Cocaine-Paired Cues after a Single Cocaine-Reactivation Session.

Amber B Dunbar, Jane R Taylor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. CaMolecular psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Apparent reconsolidation interference without generalized amnesia.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Molecular and circuit mechanisms regulating cocaine memory.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amber B DunbarDivision of Molecular Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jane R TaylorDivision of Molecular Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

Incentive Motivation in Addiction: PKA MechanismsR01DA015222 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, JANE R · 2003 to 2013
$2.7M
Decision-Making Dysfunction and Chronic CocaineR01DA041480 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, JANE R · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015222NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manipulations of memory reconsolidation can interfere with the ability of a drug-paired cue to drive drug-seeking behavior. However, the typical reconsolidation paradigm that reactivates the memory through the presentation of the cue (conditioned stimulus (CS)) only interferes with the memory of the reactivated CS while leaving other drug-paired CSs intact and able to continue driving drug-seeking behavior. Here, we used a novel unconditioned-stimulus (US) reactivation paradigm to interfere with the ability of multiple cues to drive drug-seeking behavior after just one reactivation and treatment session. Rats were trained to self-administer cocaine, during which time each active lever press resulted in an i.v. cocaine infusion paired with one of two cues that alternated within each session. The drug memory was later reactivated with either i.v. or i.p. cocaine presentation in the absence of any cue. The histone acetyltransferase (HAT) inhibitor garcinol or vehicle was injected following US reactivation to impair reconsolidation. Rats were later tested on cue-induced reinstatement to both cues. Garcinol administered after either i.v. or i.p. cocaine reactivation significantly decreased cue-induced reinstatement to both cues, indicative of reconsolidation impairment. In addition, garcinol administered in the absence of reconsolidation or at a 6 h delay when the memory should be restabilized had no effect on reinstatement, further suggesting that garcinol's effects on reinstatement are through reconsolidation-based mechanisms. Our results demonstrate that a US-reactivation paradigm may be preferable to traditional CS-reactivation paradigms for treating disorders that involve multiple CS-US associations and support investigations of garcinol as a therapeutic pharmacological agent.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAnimalsCatheters, IndwellingCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersCuesDisease Models, AnimalDopamine Uptake InhibitorsDrug-Seeking BehaviorEnzyme InhibitorsMaleMemory ConsolidationPsychotropic DrugsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationTerpenesCocaineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsEnzyme InhibitorsgarcinolPsychotropic DrugsTerpenes

Identifiers

PMID28169286
PMCPMC5520782
OpenAlexW2586617330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.