Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28169285›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2017

A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial of Plecanatide, a Uroguanylin Analog, in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

Philip B Miner, William D Koltun, Gregory J Wiener, Marianela De La Portilla, Blas Prieto, Kunwar Shailubhai, Mary Beth Layton, Laura Barrow, Leslie Magnus, Patrick H Griffin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01982240 (A Randomized, 12-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Plecanatide), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01982240 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, 12-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Plecanatide (3.0 and 6.0 mg) in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (The CIC3 Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBausch Health Americas, Inc.Ran2013 to 2015Enrolled1,394ConditionsChronic Idiopathic ConstipationArmsPlecanatide, Placebo, Bisacodyl
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Philip B MinerOklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
William D KoltunMedical Center for Clinical Research, San Diego, California, USA.
Gregory J WienerGW Research, Inc., Chula Vista, California, USA.
Marianela De La PortillaGenoma Research Group, Inc., Miami, Florida, USA.
Blas PrietoAdvance Medical Research Service, Corp., Miami, Florida, USA.
Kunwar ShailubhaiSynergy Pharmaceuticals Inc., New York, New York, USA.
Mary Beth LaytonSynergy Pharmaceuticals Inc., New York, New York, USA.
Laura BarrowSynergy Pharmaceuticals Inc., New York, New York, USA.
Leslie MagnusSynergy Pharmaceuticals Inc., New York, New York, USA.
Patrick H GriffinSynergy Pharmaceuticals Inc., New York, New York, USA.
Synergy Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USAdvanced Medical Research Institute · USCenter for Clinical Research (United States) · USGenomatica (United States) · USOklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research · USPrecision Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study assessed the efficacy and safety of plecanatide, a guanylate cyclase-C (GC-C) agonist and the first uroguanylin analog approved for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC).

methodsThis phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomized 1,394 patients with CIC. Patients received either plecanatide (3 or 6 mg) or placebo, orally, once daily, for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients who were durable overall complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) responders over the 12-week treatment period. Patients were instructed to record their daily bowel movements, stool consistency scores, and abdominal symptoms in an electronic diary. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were collected.

resultsEach dose of plecanatide resulted in a significantly greater percentage of durable overall CSBM responders (21.0%, 3 mg; 19.5%, 6 mg) as compared with placebo (10.2%; P<0.001 for both). Plecanatide (3 and 6 mg) also significantly increased mean weekly CSBM frequency from baseline (increase of 2.5 and 2.2/week, respectively) vs. placebo (1.2/week; P<0.001 for both) and mean weekly spontaneous bowel movement frequency (increase of 3.2 and 3.1/week, respectively) vs. placebo (1.3/week; P<0.001, for both) over the 12-week treatment period. Both plecanatide doses significantly improved all secondary and additional efficacy endpoints. The most common AE, diarrhea, occurred in 1.3% (placebo), 5.9% (3 mg) and 5.7% (6 mg) of patients.

conclusionsPlecanatide significantly improved constipation and its related symptoms with a low rate of adverse events. These results suggest that plecanatide will be a useful treatment option in the management of CIC. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01982240.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChronic DiseaseConstipationDefecationDiarrheaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic PeptidesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultGastrointestinal AgentsNatriuretic Peptidesplecanatide

Identifiers

PMID28169285
PMCPMC5415706
OpenAlexW2587083591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.