Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28169019›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2017

Correlates of Patient Intent and Preference on Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Masahito Jimbo, Ananda Sen, Melissa A Plegue, Sarah T Hawley, Karen Kelly-Blake, Mary Rapai, Minling Zhang, Yuhong Zhang, Mack T Ruffin

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Video Decision Aid Decreases Fear of Colonoscopy After an Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Result: A Pilot Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masahito JimboDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ananda SenDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: anandas@med.umich.edu.
Melissa A PlegueDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sarah T HawleyDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan and Ann Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Karen Kelly-BlakeCenter for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences and Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Mary RapaiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Minling ZhangDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Yuhong ZhangDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mack T RuffinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMichigan State University · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USVA Center for Clinical Management Research · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared Decision Making (DATES)R01CA152413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JIMBO, MASAHITO · 2011 to 2014
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInformation is limited on patient characteristics that influence their preference among screening options and intent to be screened for colorectal cancer (CRC). A mechanistic pathway to intent and preference was examined through a formal mediation analysis.

methodsFrom 2012 to 2014, a total of 570 adults aged 50-75 years were recruited from 15 primary care practices in Metro Detroit for a trial on decision aids for CRC screening. Confirmatory factor, regression, and mediation analyses were performed in 2015-2016 on baseline cross-sectional data. Main outcomes were patient intent and preference. Perceived risk and self-efficacy were secondary outcomes. Covariates included demographic information, health status, previous CRC screening experience, patient attitudes, and knowledge.

resultsMean age was 57.7 years, 56.1% were women, and 55.1% white and 36.6% black. Women had 32% and 41% lower odds than men of perceiving CRC to be high/moderate risk (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.47, 0.97, p=0.03) and having high self-efficacy (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.42, 0.85, p=0.006), respectively. Whites had 63% and 47% lower odds than blacks of having high self-efficacy (OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.25, 0.57, p<0.001) and intent to undergo CRC screening (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.34, 0.84, p=0.007), respectively. Younger age, higher knowledge, lower level of test worries, and medium/high versus low self-efficacy increased the odds of intent of being screened. Self-efficacy, but not perceived risk, significantly mediated the association between race, attitude, and test worries and patient screening intent.

conclusionsSelf-efficacy mediated the association between race, attitude, and test worries and patient intent.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesIntentionPatient PreferenceColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID28169019
PMCPMC13015815
OpenAlexW2585102543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.