ArticleJournal of proteome research2017
Network Marker Selection for Untargeted LC-MS Metabolomics Data.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent findings on metabolomics and the microbiome of oral bacteria involved in dental caries and periodontal disease.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- Bayesian functional analysis for untargeted metabolomics data with matching uncertainty and small sample sizes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Metapone: a Bioconductor package for joint pathway testing for untargeted metabolomics data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Lipid Profiles of Human Serum Fractions Enhanced with CD9 Antibody-Immobilized Magnetic Beads.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Article
- DNLC: differential network local consistency analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Review
- The metaRbolomics Toolbox in Bioconductor and beyond.Metabolites · 2019Review
- Missing value imputation for LC-MS metabolomics data by incorporating metabolic network and adduct ion relations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Untargeted metabolomics using high-resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is becoming one of the major areas of high-throughput biology. Functional analysis, that is, analyzing the data based on metabolic pathways or the genome-scale metabolic network, is critical in feature selection and interpretation of metabolomics data. One of the main challenges in the functional analyses is the lack of the feature identity in the LC-MS data itself. By matching mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) values of the features to theoretical values derived from known metabolites, some features can be matched to one or more known metabolites. When multiple matchings occur, in most cases only one of the matchings can be true. At the same time, some known metabolites are missing in the measurements. Current network/pathway analysis methods ignore the uncertainty in metabolite identification and the missing observations, which could lead to errors in the selection of significant subnetworks/pathways. In this paper, we propose a flexible network feature selection framework that combines metabolomics data with the genome-scale metabolic network. The method adopts a sequential feature screening procedure and machine learning-based criteria to select important subnetworks and identify the optimal feature matching simultaneously. Simulation studies show that the proposed method has a much higher sensitivity than the commonly used maximal matching approach. For demonstration, we apply the method on a cohort of healthy subjects to detect subnetworks associated with the body mass index (BMI). The method identifies several subnetworks that are supported by the current literature, as well as detects some subnetworks with plausible new functional implications. The R code is available at http://web1.sph.emory.edu/users/tyu8/MSS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.