ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2017
Normal model construction for statistical image analysis of torso FDG-PET images based on anatomical standardization by CT images from FDG-PET/CT devices.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Initial Validation of a Statistical Image Analysis Framework for Quantitative Bone SPECT/CT in Patients with Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA better understanding of the standardized uptake value (SUV) ranges of fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is crucial for radiologists. We have developed a statistical image analysis method for FDG-PET imaging of the torso, based on comparisons with normal data. The purpose of this study was to verify the accuracy of the normal model and usefulness of the statistical image analysis method by using typical cancer cases in the liver, lungs, and abdomen.
methodsOur study and the data collection (49 normal and 34 abnormal cases, in terms of PET/CT findings) were approved by the institutional review board. Our scheme consisted of the following steps: (1) normal model construction, (2) anatomical standardization of patient images, and (3) Z-score calculation to show the results of the statistical image analysis. To validate the Z-score index, we sampled 3603 and 1270 voxels in normal organs and abnormal regions, respectively, from the liver, lungs, and the abdomen. We then obtained the SUV and Z-score for each region. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis-based method was performed to evaluate the discrimination performances of the SUV and Z-score.
resultsThe discrimination performances of the SUV and Z-score for the objective regions of interest (ROIs) were evaluated by the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs). As a result of the ROC analysis and statistical tests, all AUCs were found to be larger than 0.98. When the ROIs in the objective regions were combined, the mean AUCs of the Z-score and SUV were 0.99 and 0.98, respectively, the difference being statistically significant ([Formula: see text]).
conclusionsThe results suggested the possibility of applying a quantitative image reading method for torso FDG-PET imaging. Furthermore, a combination of the SUV and Z-score may provide increased accuracy of the determination methods, such as computer-aided detection and diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.