ReviewNanoscale research letters2017
Plant Response to Engineered Metal Oxide Nanoparticles.
Review in Nanoscale research letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoparticle-assisted Treatment of Pesticide-contaminated Water for Irrigation Reuse and Growth Promotion in Brassica juncea.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Dose-dependent hormetic-like effects of green-synthesized AgNPs on Salvia officinalis: a biochemical and morphophysiological perspective.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Manganese sulfide nanoparticles (MnS NPs) enhance morpho-physiological traits, productivity and oil yield in linseed under field trial.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nanopriming with Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Enhances Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Sunflower Seeds.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle Applications in Plant Biotechnology: A Comprehensive Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Significant efficiency of Ti-MOF and Ag-NPs in antiviral effect in PVY-tobacco pathosystem.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biogenic gold nanoparticles conjugated with rhizobacteria enhance tomato growth and suppress pathogen infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Nano-Biotechnology in Soil Remediation: Use of Nanomaterials to Promote Plant Growth and Stress Tolerance.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biofortified Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles Elicit Secondary Metabolite Production in Carob Callus via Biosynthetic Pathway Activation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nanofertilizers: smart solutions for sustainable agriculture and the global water crisis.Planta · 2025Review
- DNA damage induced by ZnO and CuO nanoparticles: a comparative study against bulk materials.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025Article
- Role of Metal-Based Nanoparticles inACS omega · 2025Review
- Nanomaterials in Agriculture: A Pathway to Enhanced Plant Growth and Abiotic Stress Resistance.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Species-specific modulation of nitro-oxidative stress and root growth in monocots by silica nanoparticle pretreatment under copper oxide nanoparticle stress.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in barley: induction of oxidative stress, hormonal imbalance, and systemic resistances.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Crop management to enhance plant resilience to abiotic stress using nanotechnology: towards more efficient and sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Optimization of a rapid, sensitive, and high throughput molecular sensor to measure canola protoplast respiratory metabolism as a means of screening nanomaterial cytotoxicity.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles (CeOPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Application of nano-urea in conventional flood-irrigated Boro rice in Bangladesh and nitrogen losses investigation.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All metal oxide nanoparticles influence the growth and development of plants. They generally enhance or reduce seed germination, shoot/root growth, biomass production and physiological and biochemical activities. Some plant species have not shown any physiological change, although significant variations in antioxidant enzyme activity and upregulation of heat shock protein have been observed. Plants have evolved antioxidant defence mechanism which involves enzymatic as well as non-enzymatic components to prevent oxidative damage and enhance plant resistance to metal oxide toxicity. The exact mechanism of plant defence against the toxicity of nanomaterials has not been fully explored. The absorption and translocation of metal oxide nanoparticles in different parts of the plant depend on their bioavailability, concentration, solubility and exposure time. Further, these nanoparticles may reach other organisms, animals and humans through food chain which may alter the entire biodiversity. This review attempts to summarize the plant response to a number of metal oxide nanoparticles and their translocation/distribution in root/shoot. The toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles has also been considered to see if they affect the production of seeds, fruits and the plant biomass as a whole.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.