Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28168601›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2017

Long-term follow-up after active surveillance or curative treatment: quality-of-life outcomes of men with low-risk prostate cancer.

Lionne D F Venderbos, Shafak Aluwini, Monique J Roobol, Leonard P Bokhorst, Eric H G M Oomens, Chris H Bangma, Ida J Korfage

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05700487 (THE EFFECT OF PELVIC FLOOR EXERCISES ON URINARY INCONTINENCE AND QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER PROSTATECTOMY), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05700487 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The effect of pelvic floor exercises on urinary incontinence and quality of life after prostatectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorTC Erciyes UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled33ConditionsPROSTATECTOMY, URINARY INCONTINENCEArmsPELVIC FLOOR EXERCISES
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Psychological aspects of active surveillance.World journal of urology · 2022
    Article
  14. Active surveillance for prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2021
    Review
  15. How do prostate cancer patients navigate the active surveillance journey? A 3-year longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lionne D F VenderbosDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Na1710, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. l.venderbos@erasmusmc.nl.
Shafak AluwiniDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Na1710, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique J RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Na1710, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Leonard P BokhorstDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Na1710, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric H G M OomensDepartment of Urology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Chris H BangmaDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Na1710, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ida J KorfageDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare long-term (4-10 years) quality of life (QoL) of men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated by different modalities and a reference group without PCa.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, four groups were sent a one-time QoL-questionnaire; PCa patients (1) following the structured Prostate cancer Research International Active Surveillance protocol, (2) who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) in the context of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer-section Rotterdam, (3) who underwent radiotherapy (RT) at an academic hospital in The Netherlands, and (4) an age-matched reference group of men without PCa. The QoL-questionnaire addressed prostate-specific health (EPIC), generic health (SF-12), and anxiety (STAI-6). Statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05) and clinical relevance (≥0.5 SD) of differences between groups were assessed.

resultsThe AS, RP, RT, and reference group response rates amounted to 74% (122/165), 66% (70/106), 66% (221/335), and 75% (205/273), respectively. At a mean of 6.6 years of follow-up, active surveillance (AS)-men reported better urinary function [M = 93.0 (SD = 10.6) vs. 80.0 (SD = 19.1), p ≤ 0.001], less urinary incontinence [M = 90.0 (SD = 14.6) vs. 70.1 (SD = 28.8), p ≤ 0.001], and better sexual function [M = 40.9 (SD = 24.6) vs. 14.8 (17.7), p ≤ 0.001, clinically relevant] than RP-men. Compared to RT, AS-men reported better sexual function [M = 40.9 (SD = 24.6) vs. 25.8 (SD = 25.0), p = 0.069]. The four groups reported similarly low anxiety levels; the number of highly anxious men (STAI ≥ 44) ranged from 8 to 13%. For all QoL domains, men on AS and men without PCa reported very similar scores.

conclusionsProstate-specific function of AS-men was significantly better than that of RP-men. When comparing AS to RT, a borderline significant difference in sexual function was seen. Men who followed an AS strategy for a long-term period were not anxious and accepted it well, suggesting that AS may be a good treatment option for men with low-risk PCa.

Indexed as

AgedCross-Sectional StudiesEpidemiological MonitoringFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesActive surveillancePatient reported outcomeQuality of lifeRadical prostatectomyRadiotherapyShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID28168601
PMCPMC5420369
OpenAlexW2587335999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.