GuidelineIntensive care medicine2017
Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: ESICM clinical practice guidelines.
Guideline in Intensive care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 303 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
303 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 791 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the effects of different models of nutrient supply on nutritional status and clinical outcomes in ICU patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- External validity limitations of randomized trials cited in adult critical care clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review of guidelines published from 2015 to 2020.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of early enteral nutrition in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Risk prediction models for enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Influence of early enteral nutrition on mortality of adult patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic and application guidelines for malnutrition in adult patients (2025 edition).Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Guideline
- Risk factors for enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of enteral nutrition during prone ventilation: A meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Strategies to Maximize the Benefits of Evidence-Based Enteral Nutrition: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of Early Enteral Nutrition Versus Early Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2024Pooled it
- The efficacy of fiber-supplemented enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety evaluation of mixed nutrition for postoperative esophageal cancer patients in China: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Early Enteral Nutrition on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Sepsis Patients: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Monitoring of gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Oro-esophageal feeding for tracheostomized patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Trial
- Real-time imaging-guided visualization facilitates post-pyloric feeding tube placement in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized controlled study.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Trial
- Comparison of electromagnetic navigation-guided and conventional blind nasojejunal tube placement in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective non-randomized controlled study with two stages.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Trial
- Enhanced Patient Comfort and Satisfaction with Early Oral Feeding after Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Resection.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Trial
- Factors associated with acute mesenteric ischemia among critically ill ventilated patients with shock: a post hoc analysis of the NUTRIREA2 trial.Intensive care medicine · 2022Trial
243 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 18 institutions in 13 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo provide evidence-based guidelines for early enteral nutrition (EEN) during critical illness.
methodsWe aimed to compare EEN vs. early parenteral nutrition (PN) and vs. delayed EN. We defined "early" EN as EN started within 48 h independent of type or amount. We listed, a priori, conditions in which EN is often delayed, and performed systematic reviews in 24 such subtopics. If sufficient evidence was available, we performed meta-analyses; if not, we qualitatively summarized the evidence and based our recommendations on expert opinion. We used the GRADE approach for guideline development. The final recommendations were compiled via Delphi rounds.
resultsWe formulated 17 recommendations favouring initiation of EEN and seven recommendations favouring delaying EN. We performed five meta-analyses: in unselected critically ill patients, and specifically in traumatic brain injury, severe acute pancreatitis, gastrointestinal (GI) surgery and abdominal trauma. EEN reduced infectious complications in unselected critically ill patients, in patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and after GI surgery. We did not detect any evidence of superiority for early PN or delayed EN over EEN. All recommendations are weak because of the low quality of evidence, with several based only on expert opinion.
conclusionsWe suggest using EEN in the majority of critically ill under certain precautions. In the absence of evidence, we suggest delaying EN in critically ill patients with uncontrolled shock, uncontrolled hypoxaemia and acidosis, uncontrolled upper GI bleeding, gastric aspirate >500 ml/6 h, bowel ischaemia, bowel obstruction, abdominal compartment syndrome, and high-output fistula without distal feeding access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.