Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28168519›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2017

PCNA is recruited to irradiated chromatin in late S-phase and is most pronounced in G2 phase of the cell cycle.

Eva Bártová, Jana Suchánková, Soňa Legartová, Barbora Malyšková, Matúš Hornáček, Magdalena Skalníková, Martin Mašata, Ivan Raška, Stanislav Kozubek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eva BártováInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Královopolská 135, 612 65, Brno, Czech Republic. bartova@ibp.cz.
Jana SuchánkováInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Královopolská 135, 612 65, Brno, Czech Republic.
Soňa LegartováInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Královopolská 135, 612 65, Brno, Czech Republic.
Barbora MalyškováInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Královopolská 135, 612 65, Brno, Czech Republic.
Matúš HornáčekInstitute of Cellular Biology and Pathology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 4, 128 01, Prague, Czech Republic.
Magdalena SkalníkováInstitute of Cellular Biology and Pathology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 4, 128 01, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin MašataInstitute of Cellular Biology and Pathology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 4, 128 01, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ivan RaškaInstitute of Cellular Biology and Pathology, the First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 4, 128 01, Prague, Czech Republic.
Stanislav KozubekInstitute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Královopolská 135, 612 65, Brno, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics · CZ

Funding

Czech Science Foundation P302-12-G157The research leading to these results has received funding from the Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009-2014 7F14369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair is a complex process that prevents genomic instability. Many proteins play fundamental roles in regulating the optimal repair of DNA lesions. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a key factor that initiates recombination-associated DNA synthesis after injury. Here, in very early S-phase, we show that the fluorescence intensity of mCherry-tagged PCNA after local micro-irradiation was less than the fluorescence intensity of non-irradiated mCherry-PCNA-positive replication foci. However, PCNA protein accumulated at locally irradiated chromatin in very late S-phase of the cell cycle, and this effect was more pronounced in the following G2 phase. In comparison to the dispersed form of PCNA, a reduced mobile fraction appeared in PCNA-positive replication foci during S-phase, and we observed similar recovery time after photobleaching at locally induced DNA lesions. This diffusion of mCherry-PCNA in micro-irradiated regions was not affected by cell cycle phases. We also studied the link between function of PCNA and A-type lamins in late S-phase. We found that the accumulation of PCNA at micro-irradiated chromatin is identical in wild-type and A-type lamin-deficient cells. Only micro-irradiation of the nuclear interior, and thus the irradiation of internal A-type lamins, caused the fluorescence intensity of mCherry-tagged PCNA to increase. In summary, we showed that PCNA begins to play a role in DNA repair in late S-phase and that PCNA function in repair is maintained during the G2 phase of the cell cycle. However, PCNA mobility is reduced after local micro-irradiation regardless of the cell cycle phase.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell DivisionCell NucleusChromatinDNA RepairG2 PhaseProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenS PhaseChromatinProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenDNA repairLaminsMicro-irradiationPCNArDNAS/G2 phases

Identifiers

PMID28168519
OpenAlexW2575489209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.