Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2017
Comparison of levofloxacin and garenoxacin for antibacterial prophylaxis during neutropenia.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lower glomerular filtration rate predicts increased hepatic and mucosal toxicity in myeloma patients treated with high-dose melphalan.International journal of hematology · 2018Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Levofloxacin (LVFX) is widely used for antibacterial prophylaxis during neutropenia. Garenoxacin (GRNX), which has been investigated in Japan, has stronger antibacterial activity than LVFX against gram-positive bacteria; however, no studies have compared the effectiveness of LVFX and GRNX. We retrospectively analyzed 42 patients with acute leukemia and 32 patients who underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation. Thirty-one patients before September 2009 received GRNX, and subsequent 43 patients received LVFX. We compared the cumulative incidences of positive blood and stool cultures. There was no significant difference in the incidence of bacteremia between the GRNX and LVFX groups. However, while gram-negative bacteria were detected in 80% of the patients with bacteremia in the GRNX group, they were detected in only 33% of the patients with bacteremia in the LVFX group. Patients in the GRNX group more frequently experienced positive stool cultures than those in the LVFX group, and this was confirmed by a multivariate analysis. Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 100 and 67% of the stool culture results in the GRNX and LVFX groups, respectively. While both fluoroquinolones may be appropriate antibacterial prophylactic agents for neutropenia patients with hematological malignancies, vigilance for gram-negative bacterial infections should be exercised when GRNX is used as prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.