Trial reportWiener klinische Wochenschrift2017
Randomized controlled trial of induction at 38 weeks versus 40 weeks gestation on maternal and infant outcomes in women with insulin-controlled gestational diabetes.
Trial report in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes and their infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and their infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Predictive Factors for Successful Cervical Ripening among Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus at Term: A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Timing of delivery in women with diabetes: A population-based study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2020Article
- Gestational Age of Delivery in Pregnancies Complicated by Diabetes.Ochsner journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the impact of induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation with the induction of labor at 40 weeks of gestation in women with insulin-treated gestational diabetes on maternal and fetal outcome. STUDY
designIn this study 100 pregnant women with insulin-treated gestational diabetes were randomized to either induction of labor at 38 (group I) or 40 weeks (group II) to evaluate the rate of large for gestational age newborns, neonatal hypoglycemia, success rate of deliveries within 48 h and cesarean section rate after induction in both groups.
resultsThe difference of large for gestational age newborns was not significant between the two groups (6.8% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.49), 16 (36.4%) newborns in group I and 8 (17.0%) newborns in group II developed hypoglycemia <35 mg/dl (p = 0.04). The success rate for deliveries within 48 h after induction of labor for groups I and II was 77.3% and 92.3%, respectively (p = 0.25). The cesarean section rate after induction of labor was not significantly different between the two groups (24.1% vs. 18.7%, p = 0.49).
conclusionIn a cohort of women with insulin-treated gestational diabetes, induction of labor at 38 weeks did not significantly reduce the rate of large for gestational age newborns compared to induction at 40 weeks but seems to increase the rate of neonatal hypoglycemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.