Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28168270›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2017

Root architecture simulation improves the inference from seedling root phenotyping towards mature root systems.

Jiangsan Zhao, Gernot Bodner, Boris Rewald, Daniel Leitner, Kerstin A Nagel, Alireza Nakhforoosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Regulation of root growth and elongation in wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Genetic Variability ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Root Response to Drought Stress in Rice (International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The platformPlant methods · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Building a future with root architecture.Journal of experimental botany · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiangsan ZhaoDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Gernot BodnerDivision of Agronomy, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Konrad Lorenz-Straße 24, 3430 Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Boris RewaldDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Daniel LeitnerComputational Science Center, University of Vienna, Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Kerstin A NagelInstitute of Biosciences and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
Alireza NakhforooshDepartment of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root phenotyping provides trait information for plant breeding. A shortcoming of high-throughput root phenotyping is the limitation to seedling plants and failure to make inferences on mature root systems. We suggest root system architecture (RSA) models to predict mature root traits and overcome the inference problem. Sixteen pea genotypes were phenotyped in (i) seedling (Petri dishes) and (ii) mature (sand-filled columns) root phenotyping platforms. The RSA model RootBox was parameterized with seedling traits to simulate the fully developed root systems. Measured and modelled root length, first-order lateral number, and root distribution were compared to determine key traits for model-based prediction. No direct relationship in root traits (tap, lateral length, interbranch distance) was evident between phenotyping systems. RootBox significantly improved the inference over phenotyping platforms. Seedling plant tap and lateral root elongation rates and interbranch distance were sufficient model parameters to predict genotype ranking in total root length with an RSpearman of 0.83. Parameterization including uneven lateral spacing via a scaling function substantially improved the prediction of architectures underlying the differently sized root systems. We conclude that RSA models can solve the inference problem of seedling root phenotyping. RSA models should be included in the phenotyping pipeline to provide reliable information on mature root systems to breeding research.

Indexed as

PhenotypeGenotypeModels, GeneticPisum sativumPlant RootsSeedlingsLateral root branchingpea root systemphenotypingroot architecture modelroot elongation ratetemporal scaling.

Identifiers

PMID28168270
PMCPMC5441853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.