ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2017
Comparison of rumen bacteria distribution in original rumen digesta, rumen liquid and solid fractions in lactating Holstein cows.
Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal dynamics shifts in multi-kingdom rumen microbiota and fermentation profiles of water buffalo under heat stress.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Effects of Different Protein Feeds on Nutrient Digestion, Energy Metabolism, Methane Emissions, and Rumen Microbiota in Mutton Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Rumen Microbiota in Cattle and Buffaloes: Insights into Host-Specific Bacterial Diversity.Biology · 2025Article
- Metagenomic sequencing reveals the taxonomic and functional characteristics of rumen microorganisms in Dongliu buffalo.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Microbial inoculum effects on the rumen epithelial transcriptome and rumen epimural metatranscriptome in calves.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Postbiotics fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Characterization of rumen microbiome and metabolome from oro-esophageal tubing and rumen cannula in Holstein dairy cows.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Breed and ruminal fraction effects on bacterial and archaeal community composition in sheep.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Metagenomic Analysis Revealed Differences in Composition and Function Between Liquid-Associated and Solid-Associated Microorganisms of Sheep Rumen.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Rumen sampling methods bias bacterial communities observed.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Dietary Energy Levels Affect Carbohydrate Metabolism-Related Bacteria and Improve Meat Quality in theFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Validating the Use of Bovine Buccal Sampling as a Proxy for the Rumen Microbiota by Using a Time Course and Random Forest Classification Approach.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- The day-to-day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows.MicrobiologyOpen · 2020Article
- Comparison of Two Sampling Techniques for Evaluating Ruminal Fermentation and Microbiota in the Planktonic Phase of Rumen Digesta in Dairy Cows.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Rumen Microbiome Composition Is Altered in Sheep Divergent in Feed Efficiency.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Lysozyme improves gut performance and protects against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in neonatal piglets.Veterinary research · 2018Article
- Evaluation of Microbial Communities Associated With the Liquid and Solid Phases of the Rumen of Cattle Offered a Diet of Perennial Ryegrass or White Clover.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- 16S rRNA Sequencing Reveals Relationship Between Potent Cellulolytic Genera and Feed Efficiency in the Rumen of Bulls.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOriginal rumen digesta, rumen liquid and solid fractions have been frequently used to assess the rumen bacterial community. However, bacterial profiles in rumen original digesta, liquid and solid fractions vary from each other and need to be better established.
methodsTo compare bacterial profiles in each fraction, samples of rumen digesta from six cows fed either a high fiber diet (HFD) or a high energy diet (HED) were collected via rumen fistulas. Rumen digesta was then squeezed through four layers of cheesecloth to separate liquid and solid fractions. The bacterial profiles of rumen original digesta, liquid and solid fractions were analyzed with High-throughput sequencing technique.
resultsRumen bacterial diversity was mainly affected by diet and individual cow (
conclusionsSimilar results were found when using samples of original rumen digesta, rumen liquid or solid fractions to assess diversity of rumen bacteria; however, more attention should be draw onto bias distributed bacteria in different ruminal fractions, especially when liquid fraction has been used as a representative sample for rumen bacterial study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.