Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28167856›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2016

Prevalence of high-level gentamicin-resistant

M Emaneini, B Khoramian, F Jabalameli, R Beigverdi, K Asadollahi, M Taherikalani, A R Lari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence and Resistance Profiles of Pediatric Enterococcal Isolates: A Five-Year Update from Children's Medical Center Hospital, Tehran.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Article
  4. Molecular Analysis ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

M EmaneiniAntimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;; Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
B KhoramianDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Mashhad, Iran.
F JabalameliDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
R BeigverdiDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
K AsadollahiDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.
M TaherikalaniRazi Herbal Medicines Researches Center, Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khoramabad, Iran.
A R LariAntimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IRLorestan University of Medical Sciences · IRMedical University of Ilam · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the molecular characteristics and antimicrobial resistance of enterococcal strains isolated from patients admitted to an Iranian Hospital. Enterococcal strains were isolated from the burn patients. All strains were screened for genes encoding resistance to aminoglycoside [aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia, aph (3'), ant (4')], resistance to vancomycin (vanA, vanB), resistance to tetracycline (tetK, tetL, tetM, tetO), and resistance to erythromycin (ermA, ermB, ermC) by PCR and multiplex PCR-based methods. Genetic diversity was evaluated via Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR. All enterococcal isolates showed complete sensitivity to vancomycin with MIC ≤ 0.5μg/ml. Resistance to gentamicin, tetracycline, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin or quinopristin-dalfopristin was detected, whilst more than 96.2% of isolates were high-level gentamicinresistant (HLGR) and multiple drug resistant. The most prevalent aminoglycoside resistance gene was aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia, that was found in 96.2% (26/27) of the isolates. The most prevalent tetracycline resistance genes were tetM, found in 85.1% (23/27) followed by tetL and tetO found in 7.4% (2/27) of the isolates. The ermA and ermB genes were detected in 33.3% (9/27) and 44.4% (12/27) of the isolates respectively. RAPD-PCR analysis yielded 17 distinct profiles among 27 investigated isolates. One cluster of isolates shared the same RAPD pattern, while 16 isolates had unique RAPD pattern. Our study showed that during the examination time period one RAPD genotype was the common type and was disseminated among patients in the burn unit. Interestingly, most of these strains had an identical or very similar antibiotic and gene resistance pattern.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumGentamicinsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansIranMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentamicinsEnterococcusHLGRRAPD-PCR

Identifiers

PMID28167856
PMCPMC5289030
OpenAlexW3024390125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.