Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28167769›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Multifunctional, inexpensive, and reusable nanoparticle-printed biochip for cell manipulation and diagnosis.

Rahim Esfandyarpour, Matthew J DiDonato, Yuxin Yang, Naside Gozde Durmus, James S Harris, Ronald W Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Mobile Microfluidics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  13. Strategic foresight, leadership, and the future of rural healthcare staffing in the United States.JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rahim EsfandyarpourDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
Matthew J DiDonatoSchool of Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
Yuxin YangElectrical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
Naside Gozde DurmusDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
James S HarrisElectrical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304.
Ronald W DavisDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304; jeanne.thompson@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USNew York Genome Center · US

Funding

WHOLE YEAST GENOME TRANSCRIPTIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL GENE MAPS--A FEASIBILITY STUDYP01HG000205 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, RONALD WAYNE, HOWE, ROGER THOMAS · 1990 to 2016
$120.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS P01 HG000205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolation and characterization of rare cells and molecules from a heterogeneous population is of critical importance in diagnosis of common lethal diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis, HIV, and cancer. For the developing world, point-of-care (POC) diagnostics design must account for limited funds, modest public health infrastructure, and low power availability. To address these challenges, here we integrate microfluidics, electronics, and inkjet printing to build an ultra-low-cost, rapid, and miniaturized lab-on-a-chip (LOC) platform. This platform can perform label-free and rapid single-cell capture, efficient cellular manipulation, rare-cell isolation, selective analytical separation of biological species, sorting, concentration, positioning, enumeration, and characterization. The miniaturized format allows for small sample and reagent volumes. By keeping the electronics separate from microfluidic chips, the former can be reused and device lifetime is extended. Perhaps most notably, the device manufacturing is significantly less expensive, time-consuming, and complex than traditional LOC platforms, requiring only an inkjet printer rather than skilled personnel and clean-room facilities. Production only takes 20 min (vs. up to weeks) and $0.01-an unprecedented cost in clinical diagnostics. The platform works based on intrinsic physical characteristics of biomolecules (e.g., size and polarizability). We demonstrate biomedical applications and verify cell viability in our platform, whose multiplexing and integration of numerous steps and external analyses enhance its application in the clinic, including by nonspecialists. Through its massive cost reduction and usability we anticipate that our platform will enable greater access to diagnostic facilities in developed countries as well as POC diagnostics in resource-poor and developing countries.

Indexed as

Cell LineCell SeparationDeveloping CountriesEquipment DesignHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsNanoparticlesPoint-of-Care SystemsPrintingdiagnosticslab on a chipmicrofluidicsnanoparticlespoint of care

Identifiers

PMID28167769
PMCPMC5338449
OpenAlexW2586399312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.