Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28167642›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2017

What can large population-based birth cohort study ask about past, present and future of children with disorders of development, learning and behaviour?

Slavica K Katusic, Robert C Colligan, Scott M Myers, Robert G Voigt, Kouichi Yoshimasu, Ruth E Stoeckel, Amy L Weaver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Slavica K KatusicDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Robert C ColliganDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Scott M MyersGeisinger-Bucknell Autism and Developmental Medicine Center, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
Robert G VoigtDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Kouichi YoshimasuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ruth E StoeckelDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Amy L WeaverDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
Autism Spectrum Disorder: Birth Cohort 1976-2000, Epidemiology and Adult StatusR01MH093522 · NIMH · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KATUSIC, SLAVICA K · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF LEARNING DISABILITYR01HD029745 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI KATUSIC, SLAVICA K · 1995 to 1998
–
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034676NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD029745NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large cohort consisting of all children born to mothers from community provides 'natural' selection into different exposures and is a powerful resource for epidemiological research. A large population-based birth cohort with detailed systematic information already recorded, as part of longitudinal medical care, historical and current school data, detailed birth certificate data and all three resources available for every member of the birth cohort, are extremely rare. Our population-based birth cohort consists of all children born between 1976 and 2000 to mothers residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota, at the time of child's birth (N=39 890). In this paper, we provide a comprehensive report of the method describing the identification, the characteristics and longitudinal follow-up of each child (and family members) from the birth cohort, wealth of complementary resources of data and study measures and designs (retrospective, combined retrospective/prospective). In the last decade or so, we obtained scientific and clinically needed answers for incidence rates, potential risk/protective factors, treatment, comorbidities, outcomes, cost/usage and potential biases (that are always assessed and clinically interpreted) of many developmental learning and behavioural disorders (DLBDs) including learning and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders, intellectual disability, speech-language impairment and autism spectrum disorder. Many current and future questions related to DLBDs are remaining to be answered. The Olmsted County Birth Cohort (OCBC) is an example of a comprehensive, contemporary epidemiological research model for the development of similar research infrastructures, and its current and future results are important for replication and comparison with other population-based retrospective and prospective birth cohort studies.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentRegistriesChildCohort StudiesDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMinnesotaResearch DesignClinical epidemiologyCohort studiesLONGITUDINAL STUDIESPAEDIATRICResearch Design in Epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID28167642
PMCPMC5600202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.