Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28167454›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2017

Peripheral CD8 effector-memory type 1 T-cells correlate with outcome in ipilimumab-treated stage IV melanoma patients.

Kilian Wistuba-Hamprecht, Alexander Martens, Florian Heubach, Emanuela Romano, Marnix Geukes Foppen, Jianda Yuan, Michael Postow, Phillip Wong, Domenico Mallardo, Bastian Schilling and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Increased Tim-3Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2018
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Current Treatment Paradigms for Advanced Melanoma with Brain Metastases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Kilian Wistuba-HamprechtDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany. Electronic address: kilian.wistuba-hamprecht@uni-tuebingen.de.
Alexander MartensDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.
Florian HeubachDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.
Emanuela RomanoDepartment of Oncology, Immunotherapy Unit, INSERM U932, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Marnix Geukes FoppenThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jianda YuanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Michael PostowMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Phillip WongMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Domenico MallardoIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Bastian SchillingDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
Anna Maria Di GiacomoDivision of Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Italy.
Amir KhammariDepartment of Oncodermatology, INSERM Research Unit 892, University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Brigitte DrenoDepartment of Oncodermatology, INSERM Research Unit 892, University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Michele MaioDivision of Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Italy.
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
Paolo A AsciertoIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Jedd D WolchokMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Christian U BlankThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Claus GarbeDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.
Graham PawelecDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany; School of Science and Technology, College of Arts and Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK; Division of Cancer Studies, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Benjamin WeideDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DECornell University · USInserm · FRIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Siena · ITGerman Cancer Research Center · DEInstitut Curie · FRNottingham Trent University · GBUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the assessment of peripheral T-cell phenotypes in predicting overall survival (OS) after ipilimumab treatment is unclear. Here, we analysed mononuclear cells in the blood before and at different time points during treatment with ipilimumab in 137 late-stage melanoma patients. The proportions of baseline naïve and memory T-cells were measured by flow cytometry and correlated with OS, with an emphasis on PD-1 expression. High frequencies (>13%) of CD8 effector-memory type 1 (EM1) T-cells at baseline correlated with longer OS (p = 0.029) and higher clinical response rates (p = 0.01). The frequency of these EM1 cells and the M category had independent impacts on OS (hazard ratio = 1.5, p = 0.033; and hazard ratio = 1.9, p = 0.007). In contrast, high baseline frequencies of late stage-differentiated effector memory CD8 cells (>23.8%) were negatively associated with OS (p = 0.034) but did not correlate with clinical response. Following treatment, a decrease of CD8 cells from baseline to the time of the second drug dose and at later time points was strongly and consistently correlated with a high clinical response rate. Our observations thus suggest an important predictive role of baseline CD8 EM1 cells and changes in CD8 cells for clinical response of ipilimumab. Further validation of these biomarker candidates is warranted.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryAdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleFlow CytometryHumansIpilimumabKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMelanomaAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorIpilimumabProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorBiomarkerEffector memory cellsIpilimumabMelanomaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID28167454
PMCPMC5599126
OpenAlexW2584495362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.