Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28166775›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2017

Clinical ethics issues in HIV care in Canada: an institutional ethnographic study.

Chris Kaposy, Nicole R Greenspan, Zack Marshall, Jill Allison, Shelley Marshall, Cynthia Kitson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chris KaposyFaculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada. christopher.kaposy@med.mun.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9689-2052
Nicole R GreenspanFaculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Zack MarshallFaculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Jill AllisonFaculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Shelley MarshallWinnipeg Regional Health Authority, Population and Public Health, 496 Hargrave St., Winnipeg, MB, R3G 0X7, Canada.
Cynthia KitsonFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAWinnipeg Regional Health Authority · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is a study involving three HIV clinics in the Canadian provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador, and Manitoba. We sought to identify ethical issues involving health care providers and clinic clients in these settings, and to gain an understanding of how different ethical issues are managed by these groups.

methodsWe used an institutional ethnographic method to investigate ethical issues in HIV clinics. Our researcher conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews, compiled participant observation notes, and studied health records in order to document ethical issues in the clinics, and to understand how health care providers and clinic clients manage and resolve these issues.

resultsWe found that health care providers and clinic clients have developed work processes for managing ethical issues of various types: conflicts between client-autonomy and public health priorities ("treatment as prevention"), difficulties associated with the criminalization of nondisclosure of HIV positive status, challenges with non-adherence to HIV treatment, the protection of confidentiality, barriers to treatment access, and negative social determinants of health and well-being.

conclusionsSome ethical issues resulted from structural disadvantages experienced by clinic clients. The most striking findings in our study were the negative social determinants of health and well-being experienced by some clinic clients - such as experiences of violence and trauma, poverty, racism, colonization, homelessness, and other factors affecting well-being such as problematic substance use. These negative determinants were at the root of other ethical issues, and are themselves of ethical concern.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesEthics, ClinicalProfessional-Patient RelationsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCanadaConfidentialityCrimeDisclosureFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansMalePatient ComplianceSocial Determinants of HealthAdherenceBioethicsClinical ethicsConfidentialityHIVInstitutional ethnographyNondisclosureSocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID28166775
PMCPMC5294723
OpenAlexW2586257682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.