Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28166747›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2017

Investigating the validation of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Social Responsiveness Scale in a Mainland China child population.

Chao-Qun Cen, Ya-Yong Liang, Qiu-Ru Chen, Kai-Yun Chen, Hong-Zhu Deng, Bi-Yuan Chen, Xiao-Bing Zou

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. [Clinical effect of integrated sandplay therapy in children with Asperger syndrome].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Autistic Children With Speech Onset Delay Show Reversed Bias in Spectral Versus Temporal Auditory Processing.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chao-Qun CenChild Developmental-Behavioral Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Rd., Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Ya-Yong LiangChild Developmental-Behavioral Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Rd., Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Qiu-Ru ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, Huizhou First Hospital, NO.20, South Sanxin Rd., Huizhou, 516000, China.
Kai-Yun ChenChild Developmental-Behavioral Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Rd., Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Hong-Zhu DengChild Developmental-Behavioral Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Rd., Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Bi-Yuan ChenChild Developmental-Behavioral Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Rd., Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Xiao-Bing ZouChild Developmental-Behavioral Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Rd., Guangzhou, 510630, China. zouxb@163.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearchers from several different countries have found the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) to have good psychometric properties. However, to our knowledge, no studies on this subject have been reported in Mainland China. In this study, we investigated the psychometric properties of the Chinese Mandarin version of the SRS when used in Mainland China.

methodsThe reliability and validity of the parent-report SRS in a sample of 749 children of 4- to 14-year-olds: 411 typically developing and 338 clinical participants (202 with autism spectrum disorder (ASD)) were examined.

resultsInternal consistency for total scale (0.871-0.922), test-retest reliability (0.81-0.94), and convergent validity with the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) (0.302-0.647) were satisfactory. The SRS total score discriminated between the ASD and other developmental disorders. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses revealed that the SRS was predicted to accurately classify 69.2-97.2% of youth ASD. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) supported a single-factor solution for the ASD subsample. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not confirm the theoretical construct of five factors model with inadequate fit in the ASD subsample.

conclusionsOverall, our findings supported the reliability and validity of the parent-report SRS as one ASD screening instrument. In addition, we also suggest that the use of separate cut-offs for screening purposes (optimizing sensitivity) vs. clinical confirmation (optimizing specificity) should be considered.

Indexed as

AdolescentAsian PeopleAutism Spectrum DisorderCase-Control StudiesChecklistChildChild, PreschoolChinaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansLanguageMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsAutism spectrum disorderChinese versionReliabilitySocial Responsiveness ScaleValidity

Identifiers

PMID28166747
PMCPMC5292795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.