Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28166745›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Unpredictability dictates quality of maternal and newborn care provision in rural Tanzania-A qualitative study of health workers' perspectives.

Ulrika Baker, Farida Hassan, Claudia Hanson, Fatuma Manzi, Tanya Marchant, Stefan Swartling Peterson, Ingrid Hylander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ulrika BakerDepartment of Public Health sciences, Global health - Health Systems and Policy Research, Widerströmska huset, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. ulrika.baker@ki.se.
Farida HassanIfakara Health Institute, Plot 463 Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 78 373, Tanzania.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Public Health sciences, Global health - Health Systems and Policy Research, Widerströmska huset, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fatuma ManziIfakara Health Institute, Plot 463 Kiko Avenue, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, P.O. Box 78 373, Tanzania.
Tanya MarchantDepartment for Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Stefan Swartling PetersonDepartment of Public Health sciences, Global health - Health Systems and Policy Research, Widerströmska huset, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ingrid HylanderDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels allé 12, 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth workers are the key to realising the potential of improved quality of care for mothers and newborns in the weak health systems of Sub Saharan Africa. Their perspectives are fundamental to understand the effectiveness of existing improvement programs and to identify ways to strengthen future initiatives. The objective of this study was therefore to examine health worker perspectives of the conditions for maternal and newborn care provision and their perceptions of what constitutes good quality of care in rural Tanzanian health facilities.

methodsIn February 2014, we conducted 17 in-depth interviews with different cadres of health workers providing maternal and newborn care in 14 rural health facilities in Tandahimba district, south-eastern Tanzania. These facilities included one district hospital, three health centres and ten dispensaries. Interviews were conducted in Swahili, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. A grounded theory approach was used to guide the analysis, the output of which was one core category, four main categories and several sub-categories.

results'It is like rain' was identified as the core category, delineating unpredictability as the common denominator for all aspects of maternal and newborn care provision. It implies that conditions such as mothers' access to and utilisation of health care are unreliable; that availability of resources is uncertain and that health workers have to help and try to balance the situation. Quality of care was perceived to vary as a consequence of these conditions. Health workers stressed the importance of predictability, of 'things going as intended', as a sign of good quality care.

conclusionsUnpredictability emerged as a fundamental condition for maternal and newborn care provision, an important determinant and characteristic of quality in this study. We believe that this finding is also relevant for other areas of care in the same setting and may be an important defining factor of a weak health system. Increasing predictability within health services, and focusing on the experience of health workers within these, should be prioritised in order to achieve better quality of care for mothers and newborns.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelQuality of Health CareAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth ResourcesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyQualitative ResearchRural Health ServicesTanzaniaDistrict health servicesGrounded theoryHealth workersMaternal and newborn healthQuality of careSub Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID28166745
PMCPMC5294891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.