Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28166732›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017

Impact of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment on recurrence and mortality in patients with bacteraemia: a population-based cohort study.

Kim O Gradel, Ulrich S Jensen, Henrik C Schønheyder, Christian Østergaard, Jenny D Knudsen, Sonja Wehberg, Mette Søgaard, Danish Collaborative Bacteraemia Network (DACOBAN)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Early deaths associated with community-acquired and healthcare-associated bloodstream infections: a population-based study, Finland, 2004 to 2018.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kim O GradelCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, South, OUH Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 30, Entrance 216, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark. kim.gradel@rsyd.dk.
Ulrich S JensenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Henrik C SchønheyderDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Christian ØstergaardDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Jenny D KnudsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Sonja WehbergCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, South, OUH Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 30, Entrance 216, DK-5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Mette SøgaardDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Danish Collaborative Bacteraemia Network (DACOBAN)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on the impact of empirical antibiotic treatment (EAT) on patient outcome in a population-based setting are sparse. We assessed the association between EAT and the risk of recurrence within one year, short-term- (2-30 days) and long-term (31-365 days) mortality in a Danish cohort of bacteraemia patients.

methodsA cohort study including all patients hospitalized with incident bacteraemia during 2007-2008 in the Copenhagen City and County areas and the North Denmark Region. EAT was defined as the antibiotic treatment given at the 1

resultsIn 6483 eligible patients, 712 (11%) had a recurrent episode. A total of 3778 (58%) patients received appropriate EAT, 1290 (20%) received inappropriate EAT, while EAT status was unrecorded for 1415 (22%) patients. The 2-30 day mortality was 15.1%, 17.4% and 19.2% in patients receiving appropriate EAT, inappropriate EAT, and unknown EAT, respectively. Among patients alive on day 30, the 31-365 day mortality was 22.3% in patients given appropriate EAT compared to 30.7% in those given inappropriate EAT. Inappropriate EAT was independently associated with recurrence (HR 1.25; 95% CI = 1.03-1.52) and long-term mortality (OR 1.35; 95% CI = 1.10-1.60), but not with short-term mortality (OR 0.85; 95% CI = 0.70-1.02) after bacteraemia.

conclusionsOur data indicate that appropriate EAT is associated with reduced incidence of recurrence and lower long-term mortality following bacteraemia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacteriaChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesComorbidityDenmarkFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteraemiaEpidemiologyMortalityPopulation-basedRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID28166732
PMCPMC5294810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.