Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28166483›Full record

ReviewCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2017

The importance of regulatory ubiquitination in cancer and metastasis.

L H Gallo, J Ko, D J Donoghue

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Delving Into the Depths ofHuman mutation · 2026
    Article
  4. Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Research progress of DUB enzyme in breast cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Long noncoding RNAs regulating enzymatic reactions in cancer.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L H Galloa Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , CA , USA.
J Koa Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , CA , USA.
D J Donoghuea Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , CA , USA.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ubiquitination serves as a degradation mechanism of proteins, but is involved in additional cellular processes such as activation of NFκB inflammatory response and DNA damage repair. We highlight the E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzymes, E3 ubiquitin ligases and Deubiquitinases that support the metastasis of a plethora of cancers. E3 ubiquitin ligases also modulate pluripotent cancer stem cells attributed to chemotherapy resistance. We further describe mutations in E3 ubiquitin ligases that support tumor proliferation and adaptation to hypoxia. Thus, this review describes how tumors exploit members of the vast ubiquitin signaling pathways to support aberrant oncogenic signaling for survival and metastasis.

Indexed as

UbiquitinationAnimalsHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsSignal TransductionUbiquitin-Protein LigasesUbiquitin-Protein Ligasesdeubiquitinaseligasemetastasisubiquitination

Identifiers

PMID28166483
PMCPMC5397262
OpenAlexW2587517604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.