ArticlePloS one2017
Nestedness across biological scales.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empirical analysis of AS-level cooperation on the internet considering geopolitical characteristics.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Climate and the Parasite Paradox: Tick-Host Networks Depend on Gradients of Environmental Overlap.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The simpliciality of higher-order networks.EPJ data science · 2024Article
- Metastatic cells exploit their stoichiometric niche in the network of cancer ecosystems.Science advances · 2023Article
- Fission-fusion dynamics in the social networks of a North American pitviper.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Blue and green food webs respond differently to elevation and land use.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Resolving the Rules of Robustness and Resilience in Biology Across Scales.Integrative and comparative biology · 2022Article
- Edge disturbance shapes liana diversity and abundance but not liana-tree interaction network patterns in moist semi-deciduous forests, Ghana.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Multilayer network analysis: new opportunities and challenges for studying animal social systems.Current zoology · 2021Article
- Diverse interactions and ecosystem engineering can stabilize community assembly.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Trait-Based Modeling of Multihost Pathogen Transmission: Plant-Pollinator Networks.The American naturalist · 2019Article
- Article
- Interaction paths promote module integration and network-level robustness of spliceosome to cascading effects.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- The One Health Concept: 10 Years Old and a Long Road Ahead.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2018Review
- Hierarchically embedded interaction networks represent a missing link in the study of behavioral and community ecology.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological networks pervade nature. They describe systems throughout all levels of biological organization, from molecules regulating metabolism to species interactions that shape ecosystem dynamics. The network thinking revealed recurrent organizational patterns in complex biological systems, such as the formation of semi-independent groups of connected elements (modularity) and non-random distributions of interactions among elements. Other structural patterns, such as nestedness, have been primarily assessed in ecological networks formed by two non-overlapping sets of elements; information on its occurrence on other levels of organization is lacking. Nestedness occurs when interactions of less connected elements form proper subsets of the interactions of more connected elements. Only recently these properties began to be appreciated in one-mode networks (where all elements can interact) which describe a much wider variety of biological phenomena. Here, we compute nestedness in a diverse collection of one-mode networked systems from six different levels of biological organization depicting gene and protein interactions, complex phenotypes, animal societies, metapopulations, food webs and vertebrate metacommunities. Our findings suggest that nestedness emerge independently of interaction type or biological scale and reveal that disparate systems can share nested organization features characterized by inclusive subsets of interacting elements with decreasing connectedness. We primarily explore the implications of a nested structure for each of these studied systems, then theorize on how nested networks are assembled. We hypothesize that nestedness emerges across scales due to processes that, although system-dependent, may share a general compromise between two features: specificity (the number of interactions the elements of the system can have) and affinity (how these elements can be connected to each other). Our findings suggesting occurrence of nestedness throughout biological scales can stimulate the debate on how pervasive nestedness may be in nature, while the theoretical emergent principles can aid further research on commonalities of biological networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.