Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28166260›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Workplace interpersonal conflicts among the healthcare workers: Retrospective exploration from the institutional incident reporting system of a university-affiliated medical center.

Jih-Shuin Jerng, Szu-Fen Huang, Huey-Wen Liang, Li-Chin Chen, Chia-Kuei Lin, Hsiao-Fang Huang, Ming-Yuan Hsieh, Jui-Sheng Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Simulation-Based Team Training Programs.Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Nurses' perceptions about the influence of the labor environment in the use of psychoactive substances.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jih-Shuin JerngCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-8523
Szu-Fen HuangCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Huey-Wen LiangCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li-Chin ChenCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Kuei LinCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Fang HuangCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Yuan HsiehCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jui-Sheng SunCenter for Quality Management, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere have been concerns about the workplace interpersonal conflict (WIC) among healthcare workers. As healthcare organizations have applied the incident reporting system (IRS) widely for safety-related incidents, we proposed that this system might provide a channel to explore the WICs.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the reports to the IRS from July 2010 to June 2013 in a medical center. We identified the WICs and typed these conflicts according to the two foci (task content/process and interpersonal relationship) and the three properties (disagreement, interference, and negative emotion), and analyzed relevant data.

resultsOf the 147 incidents with WIC, the most common related processes were patient transfer (20%), laboratory tests (17%), surgery (16%) and medical imaging (16%). All of the 147 incidents with WIC focused on task content or task process, but 41 (27.9%) also focused on the interpersonal relationship. We found disagreement, interference, and negative emotion in 91.2%, 88.4%, and 55.8% of the cases, respectively. Nurses (57%) were most often the reporting workers, while the most common encounter was the nurse-doctor interaction (33%), and the majority (67%) of the conflicts were experienced concurrently with the incidents. There was a significant difference in the distribution of worker job types between cases focused on the interpersonal relationship and those without (p = 0.0064). The doctors were more frequently as the reporter when the conflicts focused on the interpersonal relationship (34.1%) than not on it (17.0%). The distributions of worker job types were similar between those with and without negative emotion (p = 0.125).

conclusionsThe institutional IRS is a useful place to report the workplace interpersonal conflicts actively. The healthcare systems need to improve the channels to communicate, manage and resolve these conflicts.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelInterpersonal RelationsWorkplaceAcademic Medical CentersAnimalsDelivery of Health CareEmotionsHumansNursesPhysiciansRetrospective StudiesRisk ManagementTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID28166260
PMCPMC5293271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.