ArticlePloS one2017
Patient factors that influence clinicians' decision making in self-management support: A clinical vignette study.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Usability and preliminary effectiveness of an app-based physical activity and education program for people with hip or knee osteoarthritis - a pilot randomized controlled trial.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Trial
- Development and feasibility of stratified primary care physiotherapy integrated with eHealth in patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints: results of a mixed methods study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Trial
- Designing a web-based factorial survey experiment on diagnostic evaluation of cardiovascular symptoms in emergency care.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Age-bias in assessments of medical decision-making capacity: a cross-sectional experimental vignette study.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2025Article
- Self-management support from health care providers in Shared Medical Appointments: Didactic techniques, peer learning, group dynamics and motivation.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Identifying psychosocial and contextual markers considered by physicians to personalize care.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Australian Dentist's Knowledge and Perceptions of Factors Affecting Radiographic Interpretation.International dental journal · 2024Article
- Latino-White Disparities in Identification and Control of Elevated Blood Pressure Among Adults With Hypertension.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Patient involvement in the encounter between general practice and patients with a chronic disease. Results of a scoping review focusing on type 2 diabetes and obstructive pulmonary disease.The European journal of general practice · 2022Article
- Healthcare providers' and policymakers' experiences and perspectives on barriers and facilitators to chronic disease self-management for people living with hypertension and diabetes in Cameroon.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Patients' and family caregivers' experiences and perceptions about factors hampering or facilitating patient empowerment for self-management of hypertension and diabetes in Cameroon.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Professionals' motivation to support parental self-management regarding children with physical disability in Dutch rehabilitation services: 'Please mind your gap'.Child: care, health and development · 2021Article
- Cardiology providers' recommendations for treatments and use of patient decision aids for multivessel coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Article
- Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis: Knowledge and Attitudes among Resident Physicians in Italy.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Weight assessment and the provision of weight management advice in primary care: a cross-sectional survey of self-reported practice among general practitioners and practice nurses in the United Kingdom.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review.Health & social care in the community · 2020Review
- Determinants of intentions to monitor antihypertensive medication adherence in Irish community pharmacy: a factorial survey.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- Recognition of mental disorders: findings from a cross-sectional study among medical students in Singapore.BMJ open · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimSelf-management support is an integral part of current chronic care guidelines. The success of self-management interventions varies between individual patients, suggesting a need for tailored self-management support. Understanding the role of patient factors in the current decision making of health professionals can support future tailoring of self-management interventions. The aim of this study is to identify the relative importance of patient factors in health professionals' decision making regarding self-management support.
methodA factorial survey was presented to primary care physicians and nurses. The survey consisted of clinical vignettes (case descriptions), in which 11 patient factors were systematically varied. Each care provider received a set of 12 vignettes. For each vignette, they decided whether they would give this patient self-management support and whether they expected this support to be successful. The associations between respondent decisions and patient factors were explored using ordered logit regression.
resultsThe survey was completed by 60 general practitioners and 80 nurses. Self-management support was unlikely to be provided in a third of the vignettes. The most important patient factor in the decision to provide self-management support as well as in the expectation that self-management support would be successful was motivation, followed by patient-provider relationship and illness perception. Other factors, such as depression or anxiety, education level, self-efficacy and social support, had a small impact on decisions. Disease, disease severity, knowledge of disease, and age were relatively unimportant factors.
conclusionThis is the first study to explore the relative importance of patient factors in decision making and the expectations regarding the provision of self-management support to chronic disease patients. By far, the most important factor considered was patient's motivation; unmotivated patients were less likely to receive self-management support. Future tailored interventions should incorporate strategies to enhance motivation in unmotivated patients. Furthermore, care providers should be better equipped to promote motivational change in their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.