Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28166195›Full record

ArticleOncogene2017

Detecting intratumoral heterogeneity of EGFR activity by liposome-based in vivo transfection of a fluorescent biosensor.

G Weitsman, N J Mitchell, R Evans, A Cheung, T L Kalber, R Bofinger, G O Fruhwirth, M Keppler, Z V F Wright, P R Barber and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Constellation of Fluorescent Biosensors to Illuminate the Galaxy of Protein Kinases.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  2. In Vivo Evaluation of PamJournal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

G WeitsmanRichard Dimbleby Department of Cancer Research, Randall Division &Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, Guy's Medical School Campus, London, UK.
N J MitchellDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, London, UK.
R EvansRichard Dimbleby Department of Cancer Research, Randall Division &Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, Guy's Medical School Campus, London, UK.
A CheungRichard Dimbleby Department of Cancer Research, Randall Division &Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, Guy's Medical School Campus, London, UK.
T L KalberUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
R BofingerDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, London, UK.
G O FruhwirthRichard Dimbleby Department of Cancer Research, Randall Division &Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, Guy's Medical School Campus, London, UK.
M KepplerRichard Dimbleby Department of Cancer Research, Randall Division &Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, Guy's Medical School Campus, London, UK.
Z V F WrightDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, London, UK.
P R BarberGray Laboratories, Department of Oncology, Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, UK.
P GordonBreast Cancer Now Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK.
T de KoningDivision of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, Guy's Medical School Campus, London, UK.
W WulaningsihCancer Epidemiology Group, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK.
K SanderInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
B VojnovicGray Laboratories, Department of Oncology, Cancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Oxford, UK.
S Ameer-BegRichard Dimbleby Department of Cancer Research, Randall Division &Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, Guy's Medical School Campus, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5227-575X
M LythgoeUCL Centre for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
J N ArnoldDivision of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, Guy's Medical School Campus, London, UK.
E ÅrstadInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
F FestyKing's College London Dental Institute, Tissue Engineering and Biophotonics, Guy's Hospital Campus, London, UK.
H C HailesDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, London, UK.
A B TaborDepartment of Chemistry, University College London, London, UK.
T NgRichard Dimbleby Department of Cancer Research, Randall Division &Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, Guy's Medical School Campus, London, UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity College London · GBCancer Research UK · GBGuy's Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15677Cancer Research UK 16463Cancer Research UK 21840Cancer Research UK A10331Cancer Research UK A15677Cancer Research UK A16463Cancer Research UK A6906European Research Council 335326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of research in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling field, and many targeted anti-cancer drugs that have been tested clinically, the success rate for these agents in the clinic is low, particularly in terms of the improvement of overall survival. Intratumoral heterogeneity is proposed as a major mechanism underlying treatment failure of these molecule-targeted agents. Here we highlight the application of fluorescence lifetime microscopy (FLIM)-based biosensing to demonstrate intratumoral heterogeneity of EGFR activity. For sensing EGFR activity in cells, we used a genetically encoded CrkII-based biosensor which undergoes conformational changes upon tyrosine-221 phosphorylation by EGFR. We transfected this biosensor into EGFR-positive tumour cells using targeted lipopolyplexes bearing EGFR-binding peptides at their surfaces. In a murine model of basal-like breast cancer, we demonstrated a significant degree of intratumoral heterogeneity in EGFR activity, as well as the pharmacodynamic effect of a radionuclide-labeled EGFR inhibitor in situ. Furthermore, a significant correlation between high EGFR activity in tumour cells and macrophage-tumour cell proximity was found to in part account for the intratumoral heterogeneity in EGFR activity observed. The same effect of macrophage infiltrate on EGFR activation was also seen in a colorectal cancer xenograft. In contrast, a non-small cell lung cancer xenograft expressing a constitutively active EGFR conformational mutant exhibited macrophage proximity-independent EGFR activity. Our study validates the use of this methodology to monitor therapeutic response in terms of EGFR activity. In addition, we found iNOS gene induction in macrophages that are cultured in tumour cell-conditioned media as well as an iNOS activity-dependent increase in EGFR activity in tumour cells. These findings point towards an immune microenvironment-mediated regulation that gives rise to the observed intratumoral heterogeneity of EGFR signalling activity in tumour cells in vivo.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsBiosensing TechniquesCell Line, TumorErbB ReceptorsFemaleFluorescenceHumansLiposomesMiceNeoplasm ProteinsNitric Oxide Synthase Type IITransfectionEGFR protein, humanEGFR protein, mouseErbB ReceptorsLiposomesNeoplasm ProteinsNitric Oxide Synthase Type IINOS2 protein, humanNos2 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID28166195
PMCPMC5421598
OpenAlexW2587057091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.