Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28165655›Full record

ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2017

Are loss of control while eating and overeating valid constructs? A critical review of the literature.

Andrea B Goldschmidt

Abstract readReviewValidation Study
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of loss-of-control eating in relation to cardiometabolic health components and inflammatory markers.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Loss of control as a transdiagnostic feature in obesity-related eating behaviours: A systematic review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Prenatal loss of control eating and cardiovascular health: Extending prior findings.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Glucose and Loss of Control Eating: Evidence From Naturalistic Assessment After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrea B GoldschmidtDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, The Miriam Hospital/Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

Neurodevelopmental substrates of emotion regulation in obese, binge eating youthK23DK105234 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GOLDSCHMIDT, ANDREA BETH · 2015 to 2018
$673k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK105234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBinge eating is a marker of weight gain and obesity, and a hallmark feature of eating disorders. Yet its component constructs - overeating and loss of control (LOC) while eating - are poorly understood and difficult to measure.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to critically review the human literature concerning the validity of LOC and overeating across the age and weight spectrum. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles addressing the face, convergent, discriminant and predictive validity of LOC and overeating were included.

resultsLoss of control and overeating appear to have adequate face validity. Emerging evidence supports the convergent and predictive validity of the LOC construct, given its unique cross-sectional and prospective associations with numerous anthropometric, psychosocial and eating behaviour-related factors. Overeating may be best conceptualized as a marker of excess weight status. LIMITATIONS: Binge eating constructs, particularly in the context of subjectively large episodes, are challenging to measure reliably. Few studies addressed overeating in the absence of LOC, thereby limiting conclusions about the validity of the overeating construct independent of LOC. Additional studies addressing the discriminant validity of both constructs are warranted. DISCUSSION: Suggestions for future weight-related research and for appropriately defining binge eating in the eating disorders diagnostic scheme are presented.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFeeding BehaviorHumansObesityProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsBinge eatingloss of controlovereatingvalidity

Identifiers

PMID28165655
PMCPMC5502406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.