Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28165060›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Novel flow cytometry approach to identify bronchial epithelial cells from healthy human airways.

Danay Maestre-Batlle, Olga M Pena, Jeremy A Hirota, Evelyn Gunawan, Christopher F Rider, Darren Sutherland, Neil E Alexis, Chris Carlsten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A novelThe European respiratory journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Human Airway and Alveolar Organoids from BAL Fluid.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Flow-Cytometric Analysis and Purification of Airway Epithelial-Cell Subsets.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danay Maestre-BatlleChan-Yeung Center for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Disease, Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Olga M PenaChan-Yeung Center for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Disease, Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jeremy A HirotaChan-Yeung Center for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Disease, Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Evelyn GunawanChan-Yeung Center for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Disease, Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Christopher F RiderChan-Yeung Center for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Disease, Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Darren SutherlandChan-Yeung Center for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Disease, Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Neil E AlexisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Chris CarlstenChan-Yeung Center for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Disease, Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sampling various compartments within the lower airways to examine human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC) is essential for understanding numerous lung diseases. Conventional methods to identify HBEC in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and wash (BW) have throughput limitations in terms of efficiency and ensuring adequate cell numbers for quantification. Flow cytometry can provide high-throughput quantification of cell number and function in BAL and BW samples, while requiring low cell numbers. To date, a flow cytometric method to identify HBEC recovered from lower human airway samples is unavailable. In this study we present a flow cytometric method identifying HBEC as CD45 negative, EpCAM/pan-cytokeratin (pan-CK) double-positive population after excluding debris, doublets and dead cells from the analysis. For validation, the HBEC panel was applied to primary HBEC resulting in 98.6% of live cells. In healthy volunteers, HBEC recovered from BAL (2.3% of live cells), BW (32.5%) and bronchial brushing samples (88.9%) correlated significantly (p = 0.0001) with the manual microscopy counts with an overall Pearson correlation of 0.96 across the three sample types. We therefore have developed, validated, and applied a flow cytometric method that will be useful to interrogate the role of the respiratory epithelium in multiple lung diseases.

Indexed as

HealthAdultAgedBiomarkersBronchiCell CountCells, CulturedCell SurvivalEpithelial CellsFemaleFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultBiomarkersFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID28165060
PMCPMC5292697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.