ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2017
In vivo quantification of aortic stiffness using MR elastography in hypertensive porcine model.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Abdominal Aortic Wall: Segmental, Positional and Flow Effects.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of measuring magnetic resonance elastography-derived stiffness in human thoracic aorta and aortic dissection phantoms.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025Article
- In Vivo Quantification of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stretch Using MRI: Relationship to Repair Threshold Diameter and Ex Vivo Wall Failure Behavior.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024Article
- MR Elastography of the Abdomen: Basic Concepts.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- In Vivo Aortic Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Validation in an Animal Model.Investigative radiology · 2020Article
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance elastography: A review.NMR in biomedicine · 2018Review
- Advances and Future Direction of Magnetic Resonance Elastography.Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAortic stiffness plays an important role in evaluating and predicting the progression of systemic arterial hypertension (SAH). The aim of this study is to determine the stiffness of aortic wall using MR elastography (MRE) in a hypertensive porcine model and compare it against invasive aortic pressure measurements.
methodsRenal wrapping surgery was performed on eight pigs to induce SAH. Aortic MRE was performed at baseline and 2 months postsurgery using a retrospectively pulse-gated gradient-echo MRE sequence on a 1.5 tesla scanner. Mechanical waves of 70 Hz were introduced into the aorta. Invasive central aortic pressure measurements were obtained prior to each scan to calculate mean arterial pressure (MAP). MRE data were analyzed to obtain effective aortic stiffness. Spearman's rank correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between MAP and MRE-derived aortic stiffness.
resultsSignificant increase in effective aortic stiffness was observed between baseline and 2 months postsurgery measurements (paired t test; P = 0.004). The average MAP, determined by pooling all animals, was 65.24 ± 9.42 mm Hg at baseline and 92.57 ± 11.80 mm Hg 2 months postsurgery with P < 0.0001. Moderate linear correlation was observed between MAP and effective aortic stiffness (ρ = 0.52; P = 0.046).
conclusionThis study demonstrated that, in a SAH porcine model, MRE-derived aortic stiffness increased with increase in MAP. Magn Reson Med 78:2315-2321, 2017. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.