Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28164157›Full record

ArticleScience advances2017

Interactions between demography and environmental effects are important determinants of population dynamics.

Marlène Gamelon, Vidar Grøtan, Anna L K Nilsson, Steinar Engen, James W Hurrell, Kurt Jerstad, Adam S Phillips, Ole W Røstad, Tore Slagsvold, Bjørn Walseng and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Population and evolutionary dynamics in spatially structured seasonally varying environments.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marlène GamelonCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Vidar GrøtanCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Anna L K NilssonCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-4988
Steinar EngenCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
James W HurrellNational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA.
Kurt JerstadJerstad Viltforvaltning, Aurebekksveien 61, 4516 Mandal, Norway.
Adam S PhillipsNational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA.
Ole W RøstadDepartment of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Norway.
Tore SlagsvoldCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn WalsengNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349 Oslo, Norway.
Nils C StensethCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
Bernt-Erik SætherCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change will affect the population dynamics of many species, yet the consequences for the long-term persistence of populations are poorly understood. A major reason for this is that density-dependent feedback effects caused by fluctuations in population size are considered independent of stochastic variation in the environment. We show that an interplay between winter temperature and population density can influence the persistence of a small passerine population under global warming. Although warmer winters favor an increased mean population size, density-dependent feedback can cause the local population to be less buffered against occasional poor environmental conditions (cold winters). This shows that it is essential to go beyond the population size and explore climate effects on the full dynamics to elaborate targeted management actions.

Indexed as

Global WarmingModels, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsSeasonsHumansdensity dependenceDipperenvironmental stochasticityimmigrationpopulation dynamicswarming

Identifiers

PMID28164157
PMCPMC5287705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.