ArticleClinical and translational imaging2014
Multimodality molecular imaging of the lung.
Article in Clinical and translational imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial lung imaging in clinical and translational settings.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024Review
- Lung imaging methods: indications, strengths and limitations.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024Review
- Morphology supporting function: attenuation correction for SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MR imaging.The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of... · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Lung diseases cause significant morbidity and mortality and lead to high healthcare utilization. However, few lung disease-specific biomarkers are available to accurately monitor disease activity for the purposes of clinical management or drug development. Advances in cross-modal imaging technologies, such as combined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging scanners and PET or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with computed tomography (CT), may aid in the development of noninvasive, molecular-based biomarkers for lung disease. However, the lungs pose particular challenges in obtaining accurate quantification of imaging data due to the low density of the organ and breathing motion. This review covers the basic physics underlying PET, SPECT, CT, and MR lung imaging and presents technical considerations for multimodal imaging with regard to PET and SPECT quantification. It also includes a brief review of the current and potential clinical applications for these hybrid imaging technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.