Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28163885›Full record

ArticleInterface focus2017

Flies compensate for unilateral wing damage through modular adjustments of wing and body kinematics.

Florian T Muijres, Nicole A Iwasaki, Michael J Elzinga, Johan M Melis, Michael H Dickinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interface focus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
54.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Insect Flight: State of the Field and Future Directions.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Florian T MuijresExperimental Zoology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5668-0653
Nicole A IwasakiDepartment of Biology, University of Washington , Seattle, WA , USA.
Michael J ElzingaDepartment of Biology, University of Washington , Seattle, WA , USA.
Johan M MelisDivision of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA; Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Michael H DickinsonDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
University of Washington · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using high-speed videography, we investigated how fruit flies compensate for unilateral wing damage, in which loss of area on one wing compromises both weight support and roll torque equilibrium. Our results show that flies control for unilateral damage by rolling their body towards the damaged wing and by adjusting the kinematics of both the intact and damaged wings. To compensate for the reduction in vertical lift force due to damage, flies elevate wingbeat frequency. Because this rise in frequency increases the flapping velocity of both wings, it has the undesired consequence of further increasing roll torque. To compensate for this effect, flies increase the stroke amplitude and advance the timing of pronation and supination of the damaged wing, while making the opposite adjustments on the intact wing. The resulting increase in force on the damaged wing and decrease in force on the intact wing function to maintain zero net roll torque. However, the bilaterally asymmetrical pattern of wing motion generates a finite lateral force, which flies balance by maintaining a constant body roll angle. Based on these results and additional experiments using a dynamically scaled robotic fly, we propose a simple bioinspired control algorithm for asymmetric wing damage.

Indexed as

aerodynamicsbiomechanicsDrosophilaflapping flightflight control

Identifiers

PMID28163885
PMCPMC5206612
OpenAlexW2564975128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.