Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28163361›Full record

ArticleField crops research2017

Root traits confer grain yield advantages under terminal drought in chickpea (

Purushothaman Ramamoorthy, Krishnamurthy Lakshmanan, Hari D Upadhyaya, Vincent Vadez, Rajeev K Varshney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Field crops research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. An overview of heat stress in Chickpea (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Root Trait Variation in Lentil (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Purushothaman RamamoorthyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India; Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad (JNTUH), Hyderabad, India.
Krishnamurthy LakshmananInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India.
Hari D UpadhyayaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India; Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States; UWA Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Vincent VadezInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India.
Rajeev K VarshneyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India; School of Plant Biology and Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chickpea, the second most important legume crop, suffers major yield losses by terminal drought stress (DS). Stronger root system is known to enhance drought yields but this understanding remains controversial. To understand precisely the root traits contribution towards yield, 12 chickpea genotypes with well-known drought response were field evaluated under drought and optimal irrigation. Root traits, such as root length density (RLD), total root dry weight (RDW), deep root dry weight (deep RDW) and root:shoot ratio (RSR), were measured periodically by soil coring up to 1.2 m soil depth across drought treatments. Large variations were observed for RLD, RDW, deep RDW and RSR in both the drought treatments. DS increased RLD below 30 cm soil depth, deep RDW, RSR but decreased the root diameter. DS increased the genetic variation in RDW more at the penultimate soil depths. Genetic variation under drought was the widest for RLD ∼50 DAS, for deep RDW ∼50-75 DAS and for RSR at 35 DAS. Genotypes ICC 4958, ICC 8261, Annigeri, ICC 14799, ICC 283 and ICC 867 at vegetative stage and genotypes ICC 14778, ICCV 10, ICC 3325, ICC 14799 and ICC 1882 at the reproductive phase produced greater RLD. Path- and correlation coefficients revealed strong positive contributions of RLD after 45 DAS, deep RDW at vicinity of maturity and RSR at early podfill stages to yield under drought. Breeding for the best combination of profuse RLD at surface soil depths, and RDW at deeper soil layers, was proposed to be the best selection strategy, for an efficient water use and an enhanced terminal drought tolerance in chickpea.

Indexed as

Deep rootsDrought toleranceField phenotypingRoot length densityRoot:shoot ratioSoil coring

Identifiers

PMID28163361
PMCPMC5221670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.