Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28163281›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational health2017

Job strain and binge eating among Brazilian workers participating in the ELSA-Brasil study: does BMI matter?

Ana Paula Bruno Pena Gralle, Arlinda Barbosa Moreno, Leidjaira Lopes Juvanhol, Maria de Jesus Mendes da Fonseca, Enirtes Caetano Prates Melo, Maria Angélica Antunes Nunes, Susanna Toivanen, Rosane Härter Griep

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Paula Bruno Pena GrallePostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation.
Arlinda Barbosa MorenoPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation.
Leidjaira Lopes JuvanholPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation.
Maria de Jesus Mendes da FonsecaPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation.
Enirtes Caetano Prates MeloPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation.
Maria Angélica Antunes NunesPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.
Susanna ToivanenCentre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet.
Rosane Härter GriepPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation.
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the association between job strain and binge eating as well as the effect-modifying influence of body mass index (BMI) on this association.

methodsA total of 11,951 active civil servants from the multicenter Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) was included in this cross-sectional analysis. Job strain was assessed using the Demand-Control-Support Questionnaire. Binge eating was defined as eating a large amount of food with a sense of lack of control over what and how much is eaten in less than 2 hours at least twice a week. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the association between binge eating and job strain as well as its interaction with BMI.

resultsAfter adjustment, and using low-strain job as the reference category, binge eating was associated with high-strain job (high demand/low control: odds ratio [OR]=1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-1.98), active job (high demand/high control: OR=1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.70), and passive job (low demand/low control: OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.53). Psychological job demands were positively associated with binge eating (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07), while greater job control and social support at work were each inversely associated with binge eating (OR=0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.97 and OR=0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98, respectively). BMI modified the association between job strain and binge eating: Heavier psychological job demands were associated with higher odds of binge eating among obese participants, while a stronger inverse association between job control and binge eating was seen among slimmer participants.

conclusionsJob strain increases the odds of binge eating and this association is modified by BMI.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBody Mass IndexBrazilBulimiaCross-Sectional StudiesEffect Modifier, EpidemiologicFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesRisk FactorsSocial SupportFeeding and eating disordersObesityPsychological stressWork

Identifiers

PMID28163281
PMCPMC5478507
OpenAlexW2585049369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.