Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28162894›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

The Neolithic Transition in the Baltic Was Not Driven by Admixture with Early European Farmers.

Eppie R Jones, Gunita Zarina, Vyacheslav Moiseyev, Emma Lightfoot, Philip R Nigst, Andrea Manica, Ron Pinhasi, Daniel G Bradley

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fifteen thousand years of bioarchaeological data reveal life history trade-offs among Europe's first farmers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Homo sapiens, industrialisation and the environmental mismatch hypothesis.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Global patterns of natural selection inferred using ancient DNA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eppie R JonesSmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. Electronic address: erj35@cam.ac.uk.
Gunita ZarinaInstitute of Latvian History, University of Latvia, Kalpaka Bulvāris 4, Rīga 1050, Latvia.
Vyacheslav MoiseyevPeter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera) RAS, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Emma LightfootMcDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER, UK.
Philip R NigstDivision of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK.
Andrea ManicaDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. Electronic address: am315@cam.ac.uk.
Ron PinhasiSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, Belfield, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland. Electronic address: ron.pinhasi@ucd.ie.
Daniel G BradleySmurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. Electronic address: dbradley@tcd.ie.

Funding

European Research Council 263441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Neolithic transition was a dynamic time in European prehistory of cultural, social, and technological change. Although this period has been well explored in central Europe using ancient nuclear DNA [1, 2], its genetic impact on northern and eastern parts of this continent has not been as extensively studied. To broaden our understanding of the Neolithic transition across Europe, we analyzed eight ancient genomes: six samples (four to ∼1- to 4-fold coverage) from a 3,500 year temporal transect (∼8,300-4,800 calibrated years before present) through the Baltic region dating from the Mesolithic to the Late Neolithic and two samples spanning the Mesolithic-Neolithic boundary from the Dnieper Rapids region of Ukraine. We find evidence that some hunter-gatherer ancestry persisted across the Neolithic transition in both regions. However, we also find signals consistent with influxes of non-local people, most likely from northern Eurasia and the Pontic Steppe. During the Late Neolithic, this Steppe-related impact coincides with the proposed emergence of Indo-European languages in the Baltic region [3, 4]. These influences are distinct from the early farmer admixture that transformed the genetic landscape of central Europe, suggesting that changes associated with the Neolithic package in the Baltic were not driven by the same Anatolian-sourced genetic exchange.

Indexed as

Cultural EvolutionFarmersAgricultureArchaeologyDNA, AncientGenome, HumanHistory, AncientHuman MigrationHumansLatviaUkraineWhite PeopleDNA, Ancientancient DNABalticgenomicsNeolithic transitionpopulation geneticsUkraine

Identifiers

PMID28162894
PMCPMC5321670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.