Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28162889›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology2017

Development of the Japanese version of the Council on Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire and its simplified versions, and evaluation of their reliability, validity, and reproducibility.

Yuko Tokudome, Keiko Okumura, Yoshiko Kumagai, Hirohiko Hirano, Hunkyung Kim, Shiho Morishita, Yutaka Watanabe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Editorial: Screening for the Anorexia of Aging.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2019
    Article
  19. Editorial: Frailty, Comorbidity, and COPD.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2018
    Article
  20. Editorial: Defining Undernutrition (Malnutrition) in Older Persons.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yuko TokudomeGraduate School of Nutritional Sciences, Nagoya University of Arts and Sciences, Aichi, Japan. Electronic address: tokudome@nuas.ac.jp.
Keiko OkumuraDepartment of Education and Research in Family and Community Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
Yoshiko KumagaiSchool of Nutritional Sciences, Nagoya University of Arts and Sciences, Aichi, Japan.
Hirohiko HiranoDepartment of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital and Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Hunkyung KimResearch Team for Promoting Independence of the Elderly, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Shiho MorishitaDepartment of Oral Disease Research, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.
Yutaka WatanabeResearch Team for Promoting Independence of the Elderly, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Nagoya University of Arts and Sciences · JPTokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology · JPMie University · JPNational Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology · JPTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause few Japanese questionnaires assess the elderly's appetite, there is an urgent need to develop an appetite questionnaire with verified reliability, validity, and reproducibility.

methodsWe translated and back-translated the Council on Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire (CNAQ), which has eight items, into Japanese (CNAQ-J), as well as the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ-J), which includes four CNAQ-J-derived items. Using structural equation modeling, we examined the CNAQ-J structure based on data of 649 Japanese elderly people in 2013, including individuals having a certain degree of cognitive impairment, and we developed the SNAQ for the Japanese elderly (SNAQ-JE) according to an exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses on the appetite questionnaires were conducted to probe fitting to the model. We computed Cronbach's α coefficients and criterion-referenced/-related validity figures examining associations of the three appetite battery scores with body mass index (BMI) values and with nutrition-related questionnaire values. Test-retest reproducibility of appetite tools was scrutinized over an approximately 2-week interval.

resultsAn exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that the CNAQ-J was constructed of one factor (appetite), yielding the SNAQ-JE, which includes four questions derived from the CNAQ-J. The three appetite instruments showed almost equivalent fitting to the model and reproducibility. The CNAQ-J and SNAQ-JE demonstrated satisfactory reliability and significant criterion-referenced/-related validity values, including BMIs, but the SNAQ-J included a low factor-loading item, exhibited less satisfactory reliability and had a non-significant relationship to BMI.

conclusionsThe CNAQ-J and SNAQ-JE may be applied to assess the appetite of Japanese elderly, including persons with some cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

AppetiteSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedAged, 80 and overFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansJapanMaleNutritional StatusReproducibility of ResultsTranslationsAppetiteDevelopment of questionnairesJapanese elderlyReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID28162889
PMCPMC5608592
OpenAlexW2585548420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.