Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28161886›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2017

Phase 1 study of narnatumab, an anti-RON receptor monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Patricia M LoRusso, Mrinal Gounder, Shadia I Jalal, Valérie André, Siva Rama Prasad Kambhampati, Nick Loizos, Jennifer Hall, Timothy R Holzer, Aejaz Nasir, Jan Cosaert and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia M LoRussoBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA. patricia.lorusso@yale.edu.
Mrinal GounderMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Shadia I JalalIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Valérie AndréEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Siva Rama Prasad KambhampatiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Nick LoizosEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jennifer HallEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Timothy R HolzerEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Aejaz NasirEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jan CosaertEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
John KauhEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
E Gabriela ChioreanIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMerck (Germany) · DEThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Macrophage-stimulating 1-receptor (RON) is expressed on macrophages, epithelial cells, and a variety of tumors. Narnatumab (IMC-RON8; LY3012219) is a neutralizing monoclonal antibody that blocks RON binding to its ligand, macrophage-stimulating protein (MSP). This study assessed safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of narnatumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods Narnatumab was administered intravenously weekly at 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg/kg or every 2 weeks at 15, 20, 30, or 40 mg/kg in 4-week cycles. Results Thirty-nine patients were treated, and 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 hyponatremia, 5 mg/kg) was reported. The most common narnatumab-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (20.5%) and decreased appetite, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting (10.3% each). Except for 2 treatment-related grade 3 AEs (hyponatremia, hypokalemia), all treatment-related AEs were grade 1 or 2. Narnatumab had a short half-life (<7 days). After Cycle 2, no patients had concentrations above 140 μg/mL (concentration that demonstrated antitumor activity in animal models), except for 1 patient receiving 30 mg/kg biweekly. Eleven patients had a best response of stable disease, ranging from 6 weeks to 11 months. Despite only 1 DLT, due to suboptimal drug exposure, the dose was not escalated beyond 40 mg/kg biweekly. This decision was based on published data reporting that mRNA splice variants of RON are highly prevalent in tumors, accumulate in cytoplasm, and are not accessible by large-molecule monoclonal antibodies. Conclusions Narnatumab was well tolerated and showed limited antitumor activity with this dosing regimen.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsCytokinesFemaleHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasmsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsCytokinesReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesRON proteinIMC-RON8Macrophage-stimulating protein receptorNarnatumabPhase 1RONSolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID28161886
PMCPMC5502198
OpenAlexW2583420974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.