Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28161884›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2017

Usefulness of procalcitonin in differentiating Candida and bacterial blood stream infections in critically ill septic patients outside the intensive care unit.

Filippo Pieralli, Lorenzo Corbo, Arianna Torrigiani, Dario Mannini, Elisa Antonielli, Antonio Mancini, Francesco Corradi, Fabio Arena, Alberto Moggi Pignone, Alessandro Morettini and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Treatment of invasive fungal disease: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2019
    Article
  13. An unusual calf lesion in an immunocompromised patient.Internal and emergency medicine · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Filippo PieralliInternal Medicine Unit 1, Careggi University Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. filippopieralli@gmail.com.
Lorenzo CorboInternal Medicine Unit 1, Careggi University Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Arianna TorrigianiInternal Medicine Unit 2, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Dario ManniniInternal Medicine Unit 2, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Elisa AntonielliInternal Medicine Unit 1, Careggi University Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Antonio ManciniInternal Medicine Unit 1, Careggi University Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Francesco CorradiInternal Medicine Unit 2, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Fabio ArenaDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Alberto Moggi PignoneInternal Medicine Unit 3, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Alessandro MorettiniInternal Medicine Unit 2, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Carlo NozzoliInternal Medicine Unit 1, Careggi University Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Gian Maria RossoliniDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to explore the role of procalcitonin (PCT) for the diagnosis of Candida spp. bloodstream infections in a population of critically ill septic patients admitted to internal medicine units. This is a retrospective case-control study considering all cases of candidemia identified in three internal medicine units, from January 1st 2012 to May 31st 2016. For each case of candidemia, two patients with bacteremic sepsis were included in the study as control cases. The end point of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PCT for the diagnosis of Candida spp. blood stream infections in patients with objectively documented sepsis. Sixty-four patients with candidemia and 128 controls with bacteremia were enrolled. Median and interquartile range (IQR) PCT values are significantly lower in patients with candidemia (0.73; IQR 0.26-1.85 ng/mL) than in those with bacteremia (4.48; IQR 1.10-18.26 ng/mL). At ROC curve analysis, values of PCT greater than 2.5 ng/mL had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.3% with an AUC of 0.76 (0.68-0.84 95% CI) for the identification of Candida spp. from blood cultures. At multivariate analysis, a PCT value <2.5 ng/mL showed an odds ratio of 8.57 (95% CI 3.09-23.70; p < 0.0001) for candidemia. In septic patients at risk of Candida infection, a PCT value lower than 2.5 ng/mL should raise the suspicion of candidemia, adding value for considering prompt initiation of antifungal therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBacterial InfectionsBiomarkersCalcitoninCandidaCandidiasisCase-Control StudiesCritical IllnessFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsItalyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersCalcitoninCandidaCritical illnessProcalcitoninSepsis

Identifiers

PMID28161884
OpenAlexW2585589461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.